Exploring issues that affect leaders in the U. S. And around the globe. Penalties are even higher, the evidence is even more volume nous, or will he cut his losses, cut a deal and tell what he knows if anything about potential collusion between donald trump and the Russian Election interference effort . Let me bring in the panel now. I want to get to my legal experts, more of my legal experts. By the way, a little more breaking news, the Cohen Hearing is officially over. Sentencing is scheduled for December 12th for his guilty plea at 11 00 a. M. Hes out on 500,000 bail which was cosigned by his wife and a second person. Were going to go there. But Donald Fryman is is on Air Force One on his way to West Virginia to prepare for a rally for the West Virginia senate race. How is he feeling . We think hes emotionally and politically in as much of a corner psychologically as hes been since hes become president of the United States. Hes worked very hard to get at
least some n. Some polls his
but there s no way you re going to marry an icon. they were just churning stories out that would feed into the public s gossipy nature. do you remember the first time that a personal piece of information was in the press, that you thought, i don t know how they got that ? it was like 2001. me and my then partner got into an argument, so i left and i went to my girlfriends and stayed there and switched the phone off. and woke up in the morning and found out that all my voice mail messages had been listened to. and i thought, that s weird. why would it not be unheard messages? didn t think anything more of it, got in the car, drove around. then i got a call from neil wallis, from the people. he said, we ve got this story that you have had an argument, and i was like, what?! he said, well, yeah. we got told by a guy in a restaurant, and i said, well, no, i was at my friend s last night.
that s it. i was obviously naive. it was as if, oh, it s ok for you to overcome adversity, but there s no way you re going to marry an icon. they were just churning stories out that would feed into the public s gossipy nature. do you remember the first time that a personal piece of information was in the press, that you thought, i don t know how they got that ? it was like 2001. me and my then partner got into an argument, so i left and i went to my girlfriends and stayed there and switched the phone off. and woke up in the morning and found out that all my voice mail messages had been listened to. and i thought, that s weird. why would it not be unheard messages? didn t think anything more of it, got in the car, drove around. then i got a call from neil wallis, from the people. he said, we ve got this story that you have had an argument, and i was like, what?! he said, well, yeah. we got told by a guy in a restaurant, and i said, well, no, i was at my friend s last night
of press interest. the details are we re engaged. that s it. i was obviously naive. it was as if, oh, it s ok for you to overcome adversity, but there s no way you re going to marry an icon. they were just churning stories out that would feed into the public s gossipy nature. do you remember the first time that a personal piece of information was in the press, that you thought, i don t know how they got that ? it was, like, 2001. me and my then partner got into an argument, so i left and i went to my girlfriends and stayed there and switched the phone off. and woke up in the morning and found out that all my voicemail messages had been listened to. and i thought, that s weird. why would it not be unheard messages? didn t think anything more of it, got in the car, drove around. then i got a call from neil wallis, from the people. he said, we ve got this story that you have had an argument, and i was like, what?! he said, well, yeah. we got told by a guy
it s not as though he s they re making decisions like at the pelican brief where he stands to make millions of dollars from land acquisitions in florida. i mean how is it corrupt, if you think it is? you know, i think his own actions demonstrate there was an awareness that it at least appears corrupt because you wouldn t work that hard to hide the source of money if you didn t worry about how it was going to appear. now, he talks about people being malicious and gossipy. i think the other way to spin that is the public is concerned about who s paying members of the supreme court and their spouses, or, rather, or their spouses. we re in an era now where there has been more scrutiny of the u.s. supreme court probably in the last month or two because of propublica and the washington post and cnn, than it feels in its history before then. we now also have there s been some stories about how two supreme court justices, sonia sotomayor, and neil gorsuch, did not recuse themselves f