asking about the investigation into the bidens. you know, what s going to be riveting, don, i think to all of us who are following, what sondland is going to say next week. as we know, he went before the committee in those in the closed investigation, and then he went back and he changed his story, as you know. he revised his testimony. the question is what does he do before he goes before the committee? he will be under oath again. so is he going to confirm this conversation, or is he going to deny it? that s what we re going to have to watch for. you know, this is to me, it s a big deal. has to say for himself.sondland- again, i don t think he can go back and revise like he did the last time. i don t know what his thinking is. but this is obviously something that is very significant. it can t potentially tie the president directly to this
against corruption, that is to do our mission, were ability to successfully conduct a campaign of disinformation against a sitting ambassador using back channels. she was fighting corruption, then why was she pulled from the scene if she s fighting corruption? it s pretty obvious that trump wants to weaponize corruption, not to eliminate it. she was trying to eliminate it. her testimony, i think, i speak for many people saying really makes me feel proud to be an american. she s obviously a very dedicated, very patriotic, very capable civil servant, who has served this country for a long time. what happens is the outrageous. and the outrage continued. even as she was testifying, trump was blaming her for the
be captured by corrupt ukrainian interests that s sought to remove an american ambassador. he gave the best statement i have heard yet, crystallizing the impact of this around the world as well as here in the united states, that anyone can take the message away that a u.s. ambassador accounts dumped essential if can you find a route into the oval office. the signal this sends is just extraordinary. i thought she was extremely powerful and very clear. she essential didn t succumb to the, well, so what? there aren t enough rep votes to do anything about it. she said essential this is nuts, i m going to testify about t. and we still have to acknowledge the facts. this was this breath of hey, remember, this is kind of crazy, it s not normal, and not acceptable. it may or may not ultimately prove to be impeachable, bus this is not acceptable.
really was not discussing the investigation of the bidens at all. he s already revised that once. but remember that gordon sondland supposedly on september 1st in fact said i was wrong before and everything, everything is contingent on the investigations that the president wants being done. and that includes the military assistance and it includes withholding the oval office meeting. gordon sondland is going to come in a televised hearing next week, and he s going to say, yes, i discussed this with the president and yes it was contingent. that would be a really significant moment. we have more to come. ousted ambassador marie yovanovitch responds in realtime t a tweet from president trump. could that lead to a new article of impeachment?
shocking revelations that we need to tell you about. it s about the overheard phone call between the president and gordon sondland, what we first heard about in the testimony of bill taylor. cnn has a copy of the openings. david holmes overheard the eu ambassador, a million dollar trump donor, gordon sondland s phone calls with president trump. okay? we re going to tell you how it all went down. it is full of evidence, evidence that is devastating for this president. let me set the scene. holmes describes a lunch on july 26th, the day after the infamous phone call. sondland, holmes, two staffers sitting on a terrace in kiev, sharing a bottle of wine. someone calls the president to give him an update. this is from page 6 of holmes