our viewers? what originally was going to happen was at the fcc was going to require that if you re an internet service provider, someone that provides broadband access for your tablets or desktop computer, you browse on there, you do certain things on there, they collect data on you before they can take that data and sell it to advertisers, to other people, they would have had to get your permission. the fact is they don t have to do that and one of the reasons is out the internet service providers like comcast and verizon and at&t are saying, this is not a fair fight. facebook and google don t have to do that, but you re requiring us to do it. jenna: that s interesting. my phone, at&t, not an advertisement, just saying. now at&t doesn t have to ask my permission, i can search for everything on my phone. they would be able to share that information whereas if i m googling something on my laptop here, google doesn t have to ask permission, they can share. right. you always want t
private and what s not. everything is out there on cyber space. we may have hipaa and you do a search and google doesn t restrict the links it will be there. it is up to them to say we will delete the links if somebody asks them. they have no way of enforcing that no, there s no statute in the united states that makes this a requirement. let s take this to another level then. we re talking about national security. we ve had a debate where there was a exchange between senator paul and governor christie about exchange of our privacy. if they do this if we can follow through with what france is saying, europe is saying would that be an infringement on our national security by having that information out there? am i asking the question the right way? it can be. because certain things are out there, whether it be security
want, google has cornered the market in that. is that correct? that s where people go first, absolutely. okay. we are talking billions of people worldwide because it s a worldwide phenomenon. not just in we re talking billions of people worldwide because it s a worldwide phenomenon not just in america. this little study here that s all celebrity driven. you can understand that, when a celebrity gets into the news renee zellweger got her face done and people want to know. they picked a lot of the trends in the market and tried to figure out where they re being googled the most. but what i m trying to get at is just because you see it on google doesn t mean it s true. it definitely doesn t mean it s true. that s the big down side because google throws everything up against the wall. they don t check everything, they don t check everything. they have their own algorithms. what s algo rithythmrhythms? how one website gets to the
want, google has cornered the market in that. is that correct? that s where people go first, absolutely. okay. we are talking billions of people worldwide because it s a worldwide phenomenon. not just in we re talking billions of people worldwide because it s a worldwide phenomenon not just in america. this little study here that s all celebrity driven. you can understand that, when a celebrity gets into the news renee zellweger got her face done and people want to know. they picked a lot of the trends in the market and tried to figure out where they re being googled the most. but what i m trying to get at is just because you see it on google doesn t mean it s true. it definitely doesn t mean it s true. that s the big down side because google throws everything up against the wall. they don t check everything, right? they don t check everything. they have their own algorithms. what s algo rithythmrhythms? how one website gets to the
links. not all of them. this is a very new law and this is very new for google to do and something google doesn t want to do. it raises a lot of questions for freedom of press and freedom of privacy and where they intersect. what do you see as being in peck should this only come to the u.s.? i don t think it will ever come to the united states. i m being honest. i don t think i think our privacy laws are much, much different than they are in europe. i m not a lawyer. but just you know, my understanding of how these things work are very, very different. if it were to come here, there would be a tremendous amount of backlash just because right of public information if information is public, removing it from a certain much query should not change whether or not people should be able to access public information. okay. thank you very much. disturbing new details in the case of the georgia father accused of killing his son by leaving him in a sweltering suv.