In the United States are driven by different standards. Also at the heart of the regulation in this area which over time has become more expensive, not just to deal with expectations that are explicitly articulated, but those that are normative. Is our recognize myself here, can you tell me what that is . Dedicated shortrange radio connections. It was an safety messages between devices. This is being developed by the department of transportation . And a whole bunch of agent ultimate soup. Agencies, suppliers, manufacturers. Andere is my concern, dod va spent over half 1 billion electronicet to Health Records to work together. This four years they said is really hard, will have to go to separate areas. Now we talk about being in industry where you have so much private sector investment, why are we even thinking about the federal government getting involved and doing this . A standard hasnt developed out of the private sector. The thing is probably going to work a little bit better, do y
That there was going to have to be pledges mutual pledges that the other guys thought i was good enough to warrant their president our president cannot did make this announcement. If we come in with some kind of a lowball, which obviously wasnt in the cards for us, but if they had seen nothing that was inadequate, that would concern them. I think they were just as concerned about a notion of the capacity of the u. S. To implement the target. They always watch our politics closely on our flickr what was going on and whats doable and not doable. Our capacity is both quite ambitious but also something we can execute based on the authorities we have. I think i was important to them. You know, because of other progress with china, it has caused a lot of people to ask about india. The thirdlargest emitter. In a very important player in the dynamics generally. We do cochairs and dialogue on climate issues and we just happened to be in delhi during that meeting during the International Session
Responsible for 45 emissions. Europe, 15 . Altogether, 60 emissions. It is a political commitment at the highest level. This would show the responsible leadership level 228 European Countries plus United States plus china. This is in terms of numbers. Paquette, this, i believe, china being a part of the game. This will inject a very Strong Political laments and to be part of this process. It can be more and more difficult for the countries who are other significant emitters who will not be a part of the coalition of finding a solution. It will be very difficult for them not to be part of the countries who want to find the solution. And these countries are the 28 European Countries, europe and china. Number three, i believe the key issue here is china. In europe and i believe in north america and asia, many people who find a solution to Climate Change say and will say we can do a lot of things to reduce emissions. But if china doesnt move, we cannot find a solution. So why should we pun
Low prices continue. More Domestic Production and that means coming from alaska. I will say in addition to the price, one of our biggest concerns you see, and we think it has gotten to the point where it is willful and every project senator senators talk about and everything is delayed. Delayed. We think it is willful and the weapon of choice of this administration to actually kill projects. It is a big problem. We have time for one more. What sort of assureance has been given that new Mapping Technology will not place the animal life in harms way in an war . It has been proven. The new and old crude oil is that big. The only person who hurts the wildlife is the human being who is shooting them. I know a little like that. They are domestic kateated now. We have wolves sleeping with the sheep. And you guys believed it. In New York Miami philadelphia, and San Francisco people say we have to save those poor little animals. It doesnt affect them. It never has. It is all a myth easily sold
That more accurately was able to define this program in an ongoing manner, what would that look like . Ideally, if every vehicle on the road or at least a large sample on an ongoing basis were equipped with sophisticated Data Collection equipment, including cameras, that would give us a great deal of insight into many of the intervening factors of crashes, including drowsiness. Short of that, i would really like to see in the National Data , which i believe is the only ongoing data system that has the means to make a reasonable determination of andher a driver was drowsy whether fatigue contributed to the crash, not in the same way but much better than simple investigation of police reports. Collection system and to be beefed up in size a number of investigations were to be done each year and of ,ittle more depth were added analogous perhaps to the Motor Vehicle Crash Causation survey, which was a one time ever done to 2007, with not only the drivers but their families, their employees