cooks. lindsey graham now on spay gate is saying we do need to learn more about this, look, there might be something there. the net effect is not that it s working, it s working because he is the president. these are members of his own party who are now being pulled along. he moves the goal post in one direction and they run toward it. so now the question is generally people who believe in conspiracy theories are not critical thinkers. haven t done a lot of digging, not trying to connect the dots. something feels emotionally intense and you think i m going to run with that because it sort of feeds something. correct. so the president it also means you re not responsible for anything. there is a hidden hand out there that is out to get you, then you are not responsible for anything that has happened or the choices you made. great point. you re not responsible for doing any digging. some of the theories he peddles can be found with one google serge, like the most rudimentary
sun dried crocodile. finally, did you ever google google, you asked the secret of immortality. it s a picture of jesse s face being stepped on by a large indian man. you re 74 years old but you stay young by drinking the tears of orphans, starving orphans appare apparently. virgin orphans. we hope they are. what do you think of the findings? do we think they want a crap about our living. they only want our views. if you live forever you can keep viewing. it s not about us looking pretty. it s about us clicking. she s totally right. this is the narcissism of the multi-millionaire ceos of goo e
i get people are prone to goo e googling god. we americans google porn more than weather? yeah. and smerconish is googled in pennsylvania, i hope you would like to know. let s talk about the political significance of what you ve learned. there s a graph i want to put up on the screen if we can. this documents the research you have performed. there it is. it shows in media market with the highest frequency of racially charged searches were obama underperformed in the 08 election relative to predictions. would you expand on this for us. basically predict how many votes obama should have received based on how many other they received. john kerry in 2004. and democrats were more popular in 2008 compared to 2004. in what parts of the country? give me specific examples.
weaan cgres sout . el tre.t thxa s wt tig pro stweas ces t abt yeerdato t. s th t wt t ro ese e dec ions tabtyeda oht s toe rerved torhe pple e whareecns the o to citreensed pe whe o dtric it ofsoluma an erybo o els dic bl: lofk, yum arean goo e bo man, mr.ray,o yls rlly b lbeli ye threoo n,omeby whr.y, i y ry pro- fe, liothhinksbortebnwh is i mu er o-hat, you shonkd terts eir x doarmutouho t a user do the on asehe aboions on don thi it s abo ll, don thinboit snsbout onhi t aborons.bo - s aut t rig of e pe, le on thein sutistrt ofors. a co tmbiaigo maf decionspe o fetr f ouelve let coiamaecns tak fet to t her oualmve t this budt, ttak isto t r m hi vohersud t wher icongss hmpos its willn th distctvo orsf erolumnga h ansayse wa toostsave a llth st dera oy fundumrogr an wheyswa o wileputoneynto rarivaun scgrols r ppleheho l e inilt e dieyrict oova scs pe lin dict o cumbi whshou theongrs me thos cbi eciswhns.ou he grill: mryinto lel t osplayg fid fopoor peoe. is .myids g l:in l
e exrts peri canonve yo lontermayou intoex s a lu sumrif caan todve. yoonrmoutoluumcaod [ me anunce] suceedg inoday mart reuiredecive ctio go o e- madean ce d taintosuhe pederinayar rereci e ioof rolut naryobilgoappse- e tra whetaver,tohene pr. rutryilps raher,ne lifesn txpernced sittg id by. fe tered ttidy. neier iinveing. e-radeinveing leasd. ei iveg. e-deveg as