A retired teacher tact for 34 years i dont agree with that eir whatever it is and i want you to know i have a couple of problems and one of them is i understand from the philosophy they have about natural plants what i do have a problem with the that it seems to have to be done with everybody in our city and i dont understand why they dont make exceptions and for instance, im very much involved with mountain davidson my wife and i have visitors that come to stay in our house and welcome them to live with us their students and all ages come from all over japan switzerland and whatever we take them the first place theyre up to it we take you them up on mountain davidson they like the trees and will have the eucalyptus tree because some come if countrys with eucalyptus trees their seeing different variations and so forth so theyre right at home we love this place we we see a forest it is not only beautiful everything about it is beautiful we see a forest that is not a fire hazard it is no
Lagoon in mortal danger by creating had been tablet two close to the ocean endangered the species a youre trying to protect areas their moss more at risk the long term effects on the lagoon and resident will be disastrous the communities of the golf course are too important to be hidden within an eir please extract the renovation plan from the final eir thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon early evening i woken one block if mountain Davidson Park in a home i walk in the forest areas almost daily the thing that is so wonderful about the forest none has mentioned it is so dense you cant see another building or hear traffic cant hear or see cars only the greenery and forest the javpz called that been proven to say a calming up literally effect on people thats what it side to you im against the cutting of 16 hundred trees in mountain davidson and dont support of eir everyone has talked about the 82 plus trees fell and the horrible release of carbons i have to say because i live
Public access. Over 2,000 pages of the documents the eir never addresses the impact of confining the public to trails. There are lots of comments about this during consultation on the draft but no response from planning. Eve inen in the response memoes they never address this ground of our appeal. Small. Rpd smalled the signs in the natural areas in 2015. Do they mean we cant walk off trail . The ramp says off trail access isnt allowed in ma 1 and 2. The signs indicate this applies to all the natural areas and last weekend i had the opportunity to watch lisa wayne leading a Walking Group in mclaren park and fielding questions from a grup of 30 people. When asked of the intent of the sign the least sensitive areas will be off limits. This means the plan asks us to give a quarter of our park land in the city to this program instead of parks wealver a few trails to walk through the areas where we used to play, picnic and explore. These maps show two things, they show trail closures and fe
Quality of life issue. I urge you not to allow the forest to be destroyed by mismanagement, dont allow trail tooz be closeed restricting access to parks stop the use of poison in the parks and vote to snd the eir back to planning deparchlt. Thank you. Thank you for the comments. Next speaker, please. Commissioners, my name is vick malhone a resident of mera loma park and want to underlying concepts that might be influencing how this whole remodeling of the eco system is going on. The conspt of restructuring a ekey system to a prior time may appeal to personal vanity but challenges realty. Applying the label Invasive Species sumes there is a no baseline or eco system populated by non native species. Is this realty . Who defines what constitute said a eco system. What date was choseen. 10 million or 5 thousand years ago or yesterday . We are dealing with a artificial contruckt here and obvious the definition of a native habitat is artificial construct and simply a guess. It also implies
Director of liveable city those clear up are tedious and it is harder to clean up the code than put it in a shredder preserve those provisions it is a massive undertaking we dont know this is a good use of time for thees hover era we ought to be taking into account do those parking reminders still serve us do we need those have we learned anything since is i hover some of those are dense areas of the city the geary and Mission Street and son through should be rational Parking Spaces and a lot of cities that are performing parking have done this downtown is one set of requirements and usually no minimums and maximum and go to the commercial corridors and the lower density ours are all over the place in large part the department has not taken this on in the liveable city and changing the parking requirements in Zoning District in of him and supervisor president london breed took the initiative there but youve got a bunch of piecemeal changes and we ought to think about a schematic for th