advocate, wouldn t chief justice roberts just say, if you want the statutory authority to do this, go to congress and get it. you re going by a law that was long before climate change was a major problem. just get the statutory authority from congress. that s all you have to do. the decision itself that justice roberts wrote doesn t take away the statutory authority of epa to regulate greenhouse gases. it was a very limited decision. but it did send a signal and it sent a signal that the supreme court is interested continually in going backwards instead of forwards. look, jake, the private sector is all in for clean energy, because it makes them money. we re interested because it creates jobs, it lowers costs for families who are struggling with the energy costs today. we know we can get this done, and we re succeeding, which is why this decision happened. so this is a major defeat for
that mark meadows would be able to provide to the committee. i think there is still a gap there, that s why exactly why we need to hear from him. that s why we are going to the lengths, to uphold this subpoena, to compel him to testify. and i think that that information he can provide to the committee is incredibly important. as far as the other potential witnesses yes. anyone who has further information to corroborate, information that s been shared by other witnesses. we want to hear it under oath! from those individuals. so we welcome them to come forward, and provide more details. about the things we have discussed in today s hearing. i m just going to pressure you on that. it has been publicly reported that robert engel the league of the presidents security detail, did give a deposition to the committee. about two and a half weeks ago. is that true? i can say that you know, we have heard from these witnesses, but clearly, we are seeking and would like to hear more informatio
stop the count that day, along with that mob of his supporters. now, remember, at this point in the hearing, we ve already learned that trump not only knew his supporters were on that day, they as they headed to the capitol. he tried to order that they not be disarmed, that all the metal detectors come down so that they can have free movement about downtown washington, d.c., without their weapons being taken away. and then, i think this has been a sticking point for a lot of people on this issue. there is this question of what exactly trump unselfish going to do there, if he did go to congress, if he did go to the capitol building? i mean, what was himself gonna, break a window, storm congress, actually go inside the building? maybe, apparently, that was one of the options, not breaking a window, but him going in was one of the options, reportedly, discussed in the trump white house before the day of. you know we re talking about a schedule did anyone say what the president wanted
corroborating records. that mark meadows would be able to provide to the committee. i think there is still a gap there, that s why exactly why we need to hear from him. that s why we are going to the lengths, to uphold this subpoena, to compel him to testify. and i think that that information he can provide to the committee is incredibly important. as far as the other potential witnesses yes. anyone who has further information to corroborate, information that s been shared by other witnesses. we want to hear it under oath! from those individuals. so we welcome them to come forward, and provide more details. about the things we have discussed in today s hearing. i m just going to pressure you on that. it has been publicly reported that robert engel the league of the presidents security detail, did give a deposition to the committee. about two and a half weeks ago. is that true? i can say that you know, we have heard from these witnesses, but clearly, we are seeking and would like
with the proud boys and the oath keepers? we know some of them were providing security for roger stone between them. as the president being read into what they are planning? we don t have evidence so far that that is the case. to the extent there was a planned armed incursion element. right. of the january 6th pressure mike pence plan. was the white house and? that by the way. there are these connections already existing. roger stone was using the proud boys as security. some members are of congress were allegedly using them as security. roger stone has the connections. it s not like they re completely disconnected. they re always in some way merkley connected. i would pay a lot of attention to anyone decides to plead out because no one would know the answer to that? the head of the proud boys, and oath keepers! they may decide that their best bet is to talk and i am very and they re under incredible pressure. huge pressure. conspiracy. as serious as a guest, more hea