co-opportunity jeff sessions, to fire andrew mccabe. he s done numerous things beyond that interview if they wanted to look beyond that interview that suggests that he has been trying to obstruct justice with regard to the investigation into russia s meddling in o election. this is all about the public perception. right. and let s remember, he makes the statement in may. what happened before this? general flynn? he makes a phone call and then he lies about it and then he s fired. we have a meeting in trump tower. the president, you know, started the first block on the show today, and what does he try to do? he tries to change the narrative, do the russians have dirt and is it about the magnitsky act and it s about child adoptions from russia. no, it wasn t. that pattern when combined with the president s own statements is a damning pattern and he s gone after every single person and it s a pattern of obstruction and it s the most damning. go ahead, chris.
laura: you actually think, even some former obama officials say, they have no evidence for, which is that russia changed the outcome of the o election, so, pennsylvania, ohio, wisconsin, et cetera, voters turned out because of prudent? do you actually really think that? the rhetorical question doesn t cut it. all intelligence agencies say that they helped elect trump. he lost about 41 mark the electoral college because in 1787, they give extra electoral vote to the other side laura: he s a manhattan guy. most conservative intellectuals, charles krauthammer, crystal laura: what you are saying right now, and when you say the intellectuals think, do you understand at all we get, you think trump is in in a disaste.
i m not in those briefings, first of all. eventually, i will be. but the second thing i m telling you is you have no source, no conclusive source that you are using other than a false article in the new york times somehow claiming you keep falling to the new york times. you are ignoring the washington post report because you want to deny the rnc aspect. i understand that. i m not. the conclusion had to do the cia s assessment do you believe let s clear this up. do you believe does the president-elect believe that russia was trying to muddy up and get involved in the election in 2016? number one, you don t know it. i don t know it. there s been no conclusive or specific report to say otherwise. that s the first thing. the second thing i would tell you is that you don t have any proof that the outcome of the o election forget who did the hacking. do you want to know? someone did the hacking. does president-elect trump want to know?
when turnout is as low as it could possibly be. campaigns. but she ran a horrific campaign, and yet he only won by a couple of points. it s also true i grew up in massachusetts. and people say, and they re right, we are a very, very democratic state. but there are republicans who o election yearshan nonelection years. and that s how romney was elected governor. we had a whole slew of republican governors. there are kind of outer suburban areas that tend to swing. so i think this will be closer than you would think by the numbers. but i think this is really impressive for warren, because, you know, if you listen to the