out. in fact, several notable names signed an order in the ninth circuit saying this executive order was both harmful and unnecessary. the people that signed that included secretaries or former secretaries of state john kerry as well as madeleine albright as well as a list of others who worked in president obama s administration. a lot of people speaking out about it. but the administration steadfast. poppy? jessica, thank you very much. let s discuss a little more. joining us, gloria browne-marshall, constitutional law professor at john j. college of criminal justice. errol louis political anchor of spectrum news and susan paige from usa today. excuse me of losing my voice after the patriots win. if something happens, blame him in the court system, people pouring in bad. this harkens back to what people think were the low points of the
campaign, where trump took on judge curiel. is it different now that he s president? it s very different. now he speaks with the authority of the presidency and the executive branch. this is the executive branch attacking the judicial branch, doing it in an unseemly way. but also causing confusion about how our system works. the judges are there to interpret the law, apply the law. this is somebody who is not a so-called junl, as he was dismissively referred to, his confirmation was like 99-0. he s duly confirmed, lifetime tenure, has probably handled hundreds, if not thousands of cases. it sidetracks the conversation. on the merits, the president is going to have to go in and make his case in court. he s not going to win this on twitter. let s talk about the argument and the merits. this is really just an injunction whether or not it will be lifted. gloria, to you, this will no doubt go to the supreme court. i doubt we ll see the president
immigration. rudy giuliani blurted out on television the other day he was told to, quote, find a legal way to implement a muslim ban. having tipped their hand they had an unconstitutional motive and end goal i wonder, can the courts consider that in their decision? the boston judge said exactly that, you re expecting me, gloria, to consider something that is not part of this case. the boston judge that s the judge who upheld this prohibition of the muslims coming in or people coming in from these seven muslim countries, majority muslim countries, said, yes, immigration is a rt great part of our nation s history, however, we have to look at what the harm could be from the immigrants entering. the president has the power to protect american sints even though on its face it looks like this is a ban against muslims. i want to say something quickly to errol s point, that is, you can t have something new trulaln
that people believe should be not taken into account in deciding cool today and what it should be tomorrow. i think the concern is that the supreme court really uses that as last resort for people minority groups. it s interesting that it s a 6-2 decision. it is. we re going to thank this about much more. thank you for answering my inartful question so well. gloria browne marshall, jonathan turley. my thanks to both of you. i ll be right back. i know a thing about an ira and i got the tools to do it my way i got a lock on equities
if not more caus particular, it is caustic. we wonder how our government will survive. we need to know based on constitutionalization that we will find a way. yes, we come to loggerheads, but it will resolve itself in probably one of the most unique ways possible. if this happens with the rule change today, it doesn t mean it will set in stone. as we can see, history five, ten years from now, it could be changed again. as you say it s a roller coaster and not something permanent. it could make it particularly risky to change the conditions and rules now. gloria browne marshall, thank you so much for being with us on this subject. another story we re following this morning, 85-year-old korean war veteran has been detained in north korea for almost a month now. meryl newman s son was on the plane home after visiting as a