outcomes? centre of all of the most likely outcomes? , , , outcomes? yes, because as i say they can no outcomes? yes, because as i say they can go either outcomes? yes, because as i say they can go either way outcomes? yes, because as i say they can go either way and outcomes? yes, because as i say they can go either way and they outcomes? yes, because as i say they can go either way and they will - outcomes? yes, because as i say they can go either way and they will be - can go either way and they will be talking can go either way and they will be talking to can go either way and they will be talking to everyone. can go either way and they will be talking to everyone. they- can go either way and they will be talking to everyone. they have i can go either way and they will be . talking to everyone. they have been talking talking to everyone. they have been talking to talking to everyone. they have been talking to everyone talking to everyone. they have been talking
will require additional money as well, so looking into the medium term, i think inevitable bending on health and care. can you hold that thought? need to say goodbye to anybody watching us on bbc two, thank you for your company, see you soon. they ve gone. sorry, do pick up soon. they ve gone. sorry, do pick up where you are. ila soon. they ve gone. sorry, do pick up where you are. soon. they ve gone. sorry, do pick up where you are. no problem! i ust think, given up where you are. no problem! i ust think, given the fi up where you are. no problem! i ust think, given the pressures, i up where you are. no problem! i ust think, given the pressures, we i up where you are. no problem! ijust think, given the pressures, we know| think, given the pressures, we know the fact the social care system has been creaking for a decade at least. the numbers need to increase what not be disentangled from funding for local government, councils are the ones who vied social care services and organ
money spending party. you are part of the evil empire. you re right there with us and the dodgers. welcome to the dark side. when i heard the score, 20-8. i knew the two of you were going to ignore the 20 runs scored and focus on the 8 given up. i knew it. we gave up. you re up 20-1 and everybody is texting everybody and you re sure that you re going to win, and then you give up seven runs in the ninth inning! you give up a touchdown. in the ninth inning. and i mean, if you ve seen how the red sox have been playing, you know, they re playing poor, hungry ball. there was no guarantee they weren t going to give up another 14 runs. i believe when it was 20 to 1 to start the ninth, i texted joe, white knuckle time and proved to be right. and to your argument, willie, the red sox have money to spend,
Transcripts for MSNBC All In With Chris Hayes 20201204 08:34:30 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
doesn t specify we want the whole program given up, did the president just move the goal post on these negotiations? i think that s been kim jong-un s strategy here all along because the freeze in nuclear testing happened in november of 2017 before this detente even began and certainly before president trump was engaged, was brought into it by kim and president moon jae-in. i think kim s long-term strategy is that the world eventually gets comfortable with him and comfortable with the fact that he possesses a couple of dozen nuclear weapons and as long as he s not testing them, maybe we can live with that. the clock is on his side, jim. he knows that trump s not popular. i m sure he was aware of this cohen testimony and where trump s numbers are and in two years he may be sitting across the table from a very different president who will be far less accommodating. so the clock really is on kim s side. i just don t see him making any big moves here over the next couple of years to gi