person s property. how is that justice. big government getting greedy. this is clear will he misapplying of the law. that s why the jury has a right to strike a law down in this case. if a law is inappropriate in a given case, the jury has a right to do this. the jury doesn t know this. when they re precluded from hearing this, from understanding this, how can there be a fair trial? steve: gary, are you going to report to jail? only if i have to, yes. and i ll pay the fine, but boy, i am just going to fight like crazy to keep the water in the ponds. the only thing this guy did wrong was stand up for what s right. steve: sure. he s guilty for standing up for what s right. what s next? go out in the wintertime on his right and you open your mouth and catch a snowflake and the state is going to say you re the containment and that s your water? are they going to regulate our air that we breathe? solar panels and sunlight? gretchen: it seems like a crazy story and we re
it took 46 days and just about seven weeks since trayvon martin was shot and killed in florida. it was a 46 days since a national outcry for justice for trayvon and a national demand for his killer to be arrested and charged. and wednesday, that man george zimmerman was arrested and charged having foregone the grand jury, angela cory announced that zimmerman was in custody and charged with second-degree murder, and also said that all of the protests calling for the arrest did not have an impact on the investigation. let me say that we do not prosecute by public pressure or petition. we prosecute on the facts off any given case as well as the
it s really because of some psychological issue. when i left today. i left my kids with my wife. i m comfortable when i get home they ll be taken care of. if that does the not happen we want to assign there must be something wrong. lets he talk about the prosecution in the casey anthony case and i know you re probably reluctant to criticize another prosecutor, you don t have the opportunity to look through what they saw. sure, sure. just from the surface, from an observant standpoint and you have greater insights than the rest of us having done a similar case. are there some mistakes you felt they would have made in the prosecution of the case. you nailed it at the beginning, i never want to a armchair quarterback, and everybody doesn t know what i m seeing and what s going on. i wouldn t want to judge them. you touched on earlier, the seeking of the death penalty or not. two things i d say on that, one, whatever punishment is available in a given case, and
do you think specter will succeed here in breaking any new ground in terms of any one of these nominees? i think senator specter has spent a great deal of time on the ginsberg rule. he said i gee with your earlier criticism about how vac wous these hearings have become. in my view, specter is right, the earlier kagan is right, she should answer these questions. i was a little bit i thought it was a little bit bizarre when he went into the question of granting cert, even i have a problem with that, i would vote to grant cert in a given case, but he did not seem to be following the democratic guide
insurance the new is going to happen? irs enforcement official steve miller testifying to the senate finance committee. what incentive do individuals have to purchase insurance if they know the irs won t be checking on seeking to collect the individual mandate penalty? we will be looking mr. grassley. we will have that matching program. we will be corresponding with people whether that triggers an examination is going to depend on a given case not in all likelihood what my boss was saying that is not the kind of case that we send out an agent to pursue. it is the kind of case we correspond with the taxpayer. at the end of the day, again congress has limited tools we can use. we will be talking to the taxpayer and have a refund offset mechanism in order to enforce that provision. that is in our tool box. greta: martin vaughn.