federal super max. why is that? because there are 15 staff members for every prisoner at guantanamo. there are 2,200 people who work at guantanamo. and so it is a very it s cost over $5 billion since we set up guantanamop. this is money. the more important question, what are you going to do with these people? others, besides me, will have to there s not a good answer to that. no country if there was we would have it. one of the things you ve heard on the talk shows lately about recidivism, are these people going to go back into the terrorism business. they had a big problem with that during the bush years, right? you ll see right here, of the 614 people who have been released since the beginning of this, most of them under bush, he was president for longer and with more of these people there, 104 have gone back into the terrorism business. most of them from the bush years. but again, this wasn t meant as a political statement. and 74 will suspected. if you add those
there. on afghanistan, she supported tripling the number of troops along with the president of the united states. she was to the right of robert gates on afghanistan. i know. exactly. i ve always said she s more of a neocon than the republicans running. i don t know how the democratic base deals with that. i don t know. i have a problem with that actually. what s that? i have a problem with that actually. is she not? she is a neocon. so far we ve seen she has been although in iran she s hopeful about the talks recently. she s admitted she was wrong about her vote on iraq. we ll see. it s funny wait a minute. she was wrong about iraq but she supported about every other opportunity to take military action since iraq. but didn t have enough influence over the president as secretary of states just saying. to your point one of the more interesting things to watch for whether there s a challenge from the left, mika s good friend elizabeth warren in her last appear
this tension in the democratic party and she did bring with her a lot of strengths. she is well known around the world a high-profile person, something important to a lot of countries when you have the secretary of state, someone who stands on the same level as the president. that was a big part as well. is she then inherently connected with, as most secretaries of states are, the president s foreign policy doctrine? is she responsible for the errors of last probably worked side by side with the president on many of these decisions. she absolutely is. she s going to have a difficult time separating herself, but what you are seeing in some of the excerpts from these books, is a couple examples of where she will say while i worked on russia, the russia re-set, i thought we should have been tougher on putin. i thought we should have ended that policy earlier. you re going to start to see her on these problem spots showing where she would separate herself from the president. it s
gradually than obama did. she would have focused on the economy in ways he didn t, and i think that, you know, this is a woman of real substance. and how does she navigate wall street? she s pretty close with wall street. she has to nav date wall street which is a big problem. okay. she she likes wall street very much. she loves listen, hold on a second. she she i m saying what you re all thinking. she s closer to wall street than almost any republican she would run against. more of a neocon than almost any republican she s going to run against. good luck, democrats. i hope it works out well for you. it s called moderation, joe. what do you think you re getting? hillary clinton. opportunist. what are we getting? yes. we re getting one of the most formidable intellects, one of the most experienced politicians and leaders we ve ever had, one of the most determined and energetic people i ve ever come across in my life and someone who you can call her a
saw it on the tv and called. otherwise her case would have assumed they tested it in a file somewhere and could link the cases together. but they hadn t tested it. why isn t this fixed. for memphis which has that number of rape kits you heard, they want $5.5 million to do this and do it right. it s a substantial sum and, you know, you spoke to this issue accurately. there are a variety of accounts of where this problem came from. shuffling off the workload year after year, mayor wharton from memphis told us he thinks there s a sexism component. i think he s trying to address this problem. he thinks there s a sexism problem. this is an account we heard from a lot of the women whose kits weren t tested, women not being taken seriously all the time and that mounts year after year. what people do agree on, though, as much disagreement as there is on the origin of the problem, the way forward. that s money. and they need that money all around the country and the merciful thing