opportunities for careers for women. they may not be explicitly discussed for the purpose of this project. there have been ideas about enterprising opportunities. with your team, i discussed about somehow creating an opportunity to carve out a portion of your laundry services, creating something that isn t surprising that we can create locally in san francisco. maybe you can add some context to this point of this model based out of ohio. i think you are referring to models were you have had either social enterprises models, which are basically nonprofits that create small-business around a certain particular sector. sometimes it is landscaping. there has been some small laundry services created a around hospitals. there are some examples of that. i have been in discussion with some folks at cpmc around opportunities that are non- health care related, and i think we will continue those discussions and try to figure out if there is some synergy and where it may be applicable
of people that are too broad groups of people, we did not see a good way to find specific entities that would sign an outside agreement. it did not seem necessary as long as we had a solid and enforceable commitments that the city could and will enforce to make sure all the obligations are in there. it did not seem to be necessary to get everything the city needed here. it is not seem to be necessary because? the community is wondering if every single actor within city government will enforce this the next 10 years. i have no idea if i will be sitting here a year from now. you do not know if you will be sitting where you are in good faith, we could negotiate this. over the next 10 or 20 years, not having a clear understanding of who could enforce these obligations has been disconcerting. to respond to that, i would break that in to two issues. we have designed the obligations to be easy and transparent to monitor. it will not be hard to see whether the obligations are b
that is part of what we re trying to figure out. the issue of whether we could find parties that would be privy to an agreement, i would be happy to work with your office. cpmc is entering into least one or more agreements with neighborhood associations. if that is happening, it might make sense to consider a broader way of doing this. i would certainly add to supervisor mar s comment. part of what we re trying to do is build the broadest community support for the product we believe will have significant impact on the city in the future. i would love to help figure out how we can get there. thank you. i have a request that we take a five minute short break. then we will come to public comment. we will lose the koran in a moment. i will say five minutes. we will reset the meeting for 5 minutes and come back. i have to run off to other meetings. i do expect to be back to other hearings. i want to thank all the members of the public for all the work we re doing together to m
being so spontaneous. i appreciate the fact that cpmc has 45% of your employees being from san francisco. can you talk about why it would be difficult putting in a number close to that in the da so that we can alleviate community concerns? we have will look into what the trends have been. how far back, 150 years? supervisor mar: let s take the last five or 10 years. i suspect their clothes that close to half of your employees have been from san francisco. i suspect that is true for more than 100 years. supervisor mar: if that has been the case for more than 100 years, is there a way to put a commitment like that into the da? are we have to think about that. our primary responsibility is to base hiring on qualifications. many of our classifications are unusual and require a substantial skills. putting that commitment in, especially with the damages provision, it is probably not something we could do. i would like to continue the conversation. i rewould hate to thin