on his part romney says he doesn t personally coordinate any super pac activities to which gingrich replies. his comments today are palpably misleading. clearly false, and politics in its worse form. laura: also on my radio show today gingrich accused rom any of, quote, defending the right to lie. now, while newt s frustration may be justified and as much as people say they don t like negative ards. let s face it, they work. check this out. in a rasmussen poll released today, gingrich comes n third place in iowa behind ron paul and mitt romney. another poll, kind of an outlier has him in fourth place and rick perry is ahead of him. as he continues to slide, gingrich reiterated his pledge not to go negative. he also challenged romney to call off the dogs and released this christmas themed ad in iowa. is there anything more inspiring than american towns
and run negatives against paul, not against gingrich. laura: why should romney be negative against paul? it helps gingrich because is he no longer the guy getting the shots. and i think that what s most likely to happen here is everybody will close in and go negative on paul because he is surging. laura: i don t see that. romney will win but gingrich may at that point rise to a second place finish, i also think that romney will win iowa and new hampshire. i think gingrich will come back in south carolina where i don t think they will vote on a primary. contenders all the way through what about rick santorum. what about rick perry? they have been doing the retail style politicking in that state for many, many
to answer. is he going negative not because he doesn t have the money to compete with negatives. i do think that gingrich has one saving grace here. ron paul. i think the higher ron paul goes the more everybody is going to be focusing on paul, not on gingrich. i think that s going to help newt recover and help romney probably win. laura: i don t get that i know you know a lot about a lot of things. i m looking at the numbers here. when ron paul goes up. newt gingrich goes down. mitt romney does not go up when ron paul goes up. in fact, they the percentage that newt gingrich is losing is not going to romney. it s going to paul. how does ron paul s rise help newt gingrich at this point? i think it s the opposite. i think newt has to start taking off the gloves on ron paul too. i m saying he should. the higher ron paul goes, the more attention he gets. the more attention he gets, the more he becomes the boogie man. and the more all the other candidates have to close in
on his part romney says he doesn t personally coordinate any super pac activities to which gingrich replies. his comments today are palpably misleading. clearly false, and politics in its worse form. laura: also on my radio show today gingrich accused rom any of, quote, defending the right to lie. now, while newt s frustration may be justified and as much as people say they don t like negative ards. let s face it, they work. check this out. in a rasmussen poll released today, gingrich comes n third place in iowa behind ron paul and mitt romney. another poll, kind of an outlier has him in fourth place and rick perry is ahead of him. as he continues to slide, gingrich reiterated his pledge not to go negative. he also challenged romney to call off the dogs and released this christmas themed ad in iowa. is there anything more inspiring than american towns