gingrich ran in there. what kind of man would mislead and deceive just to win an election? this man would. mitt romney. romney s ad has always voted republican we had the opportunity but in 1992 massachusetts primary, he had the chance to vote for george h.w. bush or pat buchanan but he voted for a liberal democrat instead. his investments in fannie mae and freddie mac were in a blind trust but as reported romney earns tens of thousands of dollars not in a blind trust. sean: so he ran one of romney adds and gingrich ads, romney had more money. obviously this ad didn t work. look at the results tonight. that speaks for itself. sean: i ll be honest. one thing i said. i thought that newt s debate appearances in south carolina were so powerful was such a game
one going negative. and the guy behind some of the gingrich ads, a strategist for winning our future, and good to you have, sir, thank you for coming. i know that old line, dirt on mud for one is a fact finding session for another. but criticism that i have been looking at and the speaker in his criticism, that, you know, he can dish it out but he can t take it. and he has dished out his own negative ads, hasn t he? guest: negative ads, if you remember back in iowa he wanted a positive campaign and we did not run negative ads in iowa and 43 percent of the ads were run against newt gingrich and we did not compete in new hampshire because that is his hometown, if you will his home state, and we competed in south carolina, and we had negative ads that had an
gingrich ran in there. what kind of man would mislead and deceive just to win an election? this man would. mitt romney. romney s ad has always voted republican we had the opportunity but in 1992 massachusetts primary, he had the chance to vote for george h.w. bush or pat buchanan but he voted for a liberal democrat instead. his investments in fannie mae and freddie mac were in a blind trust but as reported romney earns tens of thousands of dollars not in a blind trust. sean: so he ran one of romney adds and gingrich ads, romney had more money. obviously this ad didn t work. look at the results tonight. that speaks for itself. sean: i ll be honest. one thing i said. i thought that newt s debate appearances in south carolina were so powerful was such a game
gingrich ran in there. what kind of man would mislead and deceive just to win an election? this man would. mitt romney. romney s ad has always voted republican we had the opportunity but in 1992 massachusetts primary, he had the chance to vote for george h.w. bush or pat buchanan but he voted for a liberal democrat instead. his investments in fannie mae and freddie mac were in a blind trust but as reported romney earns tens of thousands of dollars not in a blind trust. sean: so he ran one of romney adds and gingrich ads, romney had more money. obviously this ad didn t work. look at the results tonight. that speaks for itself. sean: i ll be honest. one thing i said. i thought that newt s debate appearances in south carolina were so powerful was such a game
mitt romney are both channelling occupy wall street in their attacks of mitt romney. i don t get the language here. because, you know, when you go back to where we started this process, everyone was agreed, reagan s eleventh commandment would be the corner stone. clearly romney had a different plan there, threw a couple of rocks and got this thing going. but there does come a point where like you pointed out, joe, the language crosses over and becomes much more fodder for obama and his team to be using come september/october they re feeding they re feeding the script. the dnc is not writing anything, they re just watching tv. and david corn s going to be on today. and talking yesterday about how the obama white house is waiting for the gingrich ads to run in south carolina, they re going to pull together focus groups and see which line of attack works best against mitt romney. and they re going to take that, take the $5 million in conservative money, and they re going to u