president not support it. if they have to go back dollar for dollar, small increases, dollar for raising the debt sealing that is fine. at least put the debt ceiling that is fine. at least put the onus on the president. i think they should call his bluff. we saw obama blink when it came to cutting the bush tax cuts. i think he will blink again. the only area where i differ slightly is, i think republicans need to keep it simple. a balanced budget amendment is not going to pass. sean: i want the democrats on record. it is kind of gimmicky. the whole thing is a game on some level. that is what is frustrating to the american public this idea there s a debt ceiling. they create a set of rules, when the rules aren t working they want to change the rules in the middle of the game. who does that? kids. it is not a game throw. but it is being treated
artificial intelligence, there will be a merging of man and machine and basically people will be functionally able to live forever. whether that s because your brain in a sense has been scanned and put into a machine or there are neural transistors or artificial intelligence put into your body. the idea of cingulsingularity, is a phrase i love. oh, my gosh. jon meacham, what say you? that s fascinating. it is. all right. singularity. it s a little gimmicky. the idea is, of course, that the rate of computing power is expanding exponentially. it s increasing, doubling every two years. basically the great prophet of
it means that students in illinois and west virginia who count on rachel and shannon are going to be not getting the education that they deserve. helping to keep teachers in place. you just heard the president talk about that money there. also you heard my conversation a moment ago with the superintendent where their school district is doing away with the grade of d. we want to hit a couple of these topics and more with our education contributor, friend of our show, dr. steve perry here with us. good to have you back with us, steve. this has got to be a good idea. no ds. well, it feels gimmicky. it feels like the removal of the d doesn t necessarily increase the student s performance. we have to ask the question what is the intent here. if the intent is to in fact in fact increase the expectations of children, who could argue with that? the problem is that i haven t heard enough from the superintendent mr. reynolds or even in any information i ve
gimmi gimmicky. the key is known as h.i.t. high interval training. high intensity training burns more calories and possibly build more muscle than someone that jogs leisurely for even an hour. here s why. the dper size very intensely for a minute, take a break for a minute, exercise for a minute and take a break and so on and so forth for 20 minutes for hard exercise and ten minutes of a little bit more rest. what they found was, first of all, the heart rate while did it drop in the rest periods, did not drop significantly. so you were continuing to have an aerobic workout. the second thing was your endurance measured after a period of time seemed to be almost as good as someone who did the longer, more leisurely workouts. a lot of benefit in a much shorter time. there s all types of exercise to work. cycling, running, swimming. these sports are better for this
the stimulus not only created an enormous number of jobs but saved us from a much worse economy. we need more. and it was economicist that got us into the mess. i think we should be asking them, too, rick. i looked at something that economist can t aagree. you apply multipliers and you do these odd gimmicky things. the bottom line is that american people are smarter and if you do stimulus and pump money in the system we pay for it later. can or you are punishing favorites. it is not what it used to be. morgan doesn t cheat money.