am very keen for every possible form of scrutiny and if the house of commons can do whatever it wants to do but all i would say is that i don t think that that should happen until the investigation is completed and that is my only point. i have said this time and again, let s get. let s let the investigators do their stuff and then knock this thing on the head stop when you are committed to allowing in a vote once the sue gray report has come out and once the met have decided how many find they are going to dish out. a parliament will have a vote on whether parliament will have a vote on whether to parliament will have a vote on whether to at parliament will have a vote on whether to at another - parliament will have a vote on l whether to at another privileges committee whether to at another privileges committee to whether to at another privileges committee to look whether to at another privileges committee to look at whether to at another privileges committee to look at w
and that is my only point. i have said this time and again, let s get. let s let the investigators do their stuff and then knock this thing on the head. you are committed to allowing a vote once the sue gray report has come i out and once the met have decided how many fines they are going - to dish out, parliament will have a vote on whether to ask i the privileges committee to look. at whether you misled parliament? that is fine but i think what i m saying is that people should have the full facts and in the meantime, what i want to do is get on with the job. here we are in a gigantic newjcb factory, as i say, in gujarat, and an absolutely amazing example of the. what is the word i want? the synergy, the synthesis between uk technology and indian technology. what i am going to be talking about with narendra modi is all the ways in which we are
and again, let s get. let s let the investigators do their stuff and then knock this thing on the head. you are committed to allowing a vote once the sue gray report has come i out and once the met have decided how many fines i they are going to dish out, | parliament will have a vote on whether to allow the privileges committee to look at whether you misled parliament? that is fine but all i m saying is that i think people should have the full facts, and in the meantime, what i want to do is get on with the job. here we are in a gigantic newjcb factory, as i say, in gujarat, and an absolutely amazing example of the. what is the word i want? the synergy, the synthesis between uk technology and indian technology. what i am going to be talking about with narendra modi is all the ways in which we are going to develop that partnership. there is a big appetite for that on either side. for mps who are discussing your. probity this afternoon in the house
saying is that people should have the full facts and in the meantime, what i want to do is get on with the job. here we are in a gigantic newjcb factory, as i say, in gujarat, and an absolutely amazing example of the. what is the word i want? the synergy, the synthesis between uk technology and indian technology. what i am going to be talking about with narendra modi is all the ways in which we are going to develop that partnership. there is a big appetite for that. mps are discussing your probity thisj afternoon in the house of commons and some are saying you did mislead them, with all the statements - you made as these revelations came out, what do you say to them? - i the answer to the straight question, i did you mislead the house of commons knowingly or inadvertently? of course not. it is up to them. they must do whatever they want. that is their prerogative. i want to focus on the amazing