john, do you think the redacted version of the affidavit will reveal many new details? i think it could. i think that seems to be well took the judge over to the side of releasing this material. that was his inclination and he wanted to see a strong case by the justice as to why not, and he didn t get that. they obviously did come forward. but i can t imagine that trump is going to be happy with this document, given the fact it was an advocacy document written to persuade the judge, to find probable cause to undertake a search. that isn t the document that s going to put a lot of places in for donald trump, to the exact opposite. so, i think he s going to be very unhappy with what he finds and what comes out. and it will not be good for donald trump. and judge gertner, does it make sense to you, from a legal standpoint, that the former
New Jersey Township Officials Reject Court Claim of Discrimination Against Orthodox Jews
algemeiner.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from algemeiner.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
york or kyiv. and judge gertner, thanks to you as well. i didn t have time to get you on the jet analogy, but maybe we ll get you back again. i want that jet. who wouldn t. up ahead as promised the legendary sdny prosecutor helping us understand the related giuliani probe and also how he came to depict the mobsters in the new movie. depi mobsters in the new movie. living joyfully. the united explorer card hooks me up.
refuting these accusations is possible. it doesn t make any sense. chairman grassley to democrats said because ford s allegations are in the public arena, there s flow longer a need for a confidential fbi investigation. does that make sense to you. do doesn t make any sense. if a judicial candidate will said when i was in college i tried cocaine, it probably would have been disqualifying. if someone else said they saw me do that, then there would abinvestigation and whether it was public or private is really irrelevant. it s part of the fbi s background investigation responsibility which the president or the committee i believe could trigger. judge gertner, stay with us. i want to bring in chief legal analyst jeffrey toobin, as well as carrie severe rin know from the justice crisis network supporting the nomination. both sides seem to be digging in
to the conclusion. judge gertner, do you buy her argument. any fbi investigation, it s not in secret. you re asking neighbors fbi knocks on a neighbor s door and then the fbi people figure out you re being investigated by the fbi. yeah, but if the argument here is that this investigation by if the fbi were to investigate it would somehow be tainted because the information has already come out, then surely a hearing without the benefit of any investigation is even more problematic. the notion here that the president could not pick up the phone and say, can you look further into this allegation just doesn t make sense. and the fact that it s public she has made it public. that would mean that people would be more prepared but that doesn t disqualify the investigation any more than this hearing does. carrie, i want you to respond to that. the allegations are vague enough. there s flow location you can go to. you can t dust for prints.
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.