democrats for ignoring the constitutional amendment. adopted by voters in 2014. similar to the ohio law. to curb political influence in the redistricting process. just like in ohio, the court in this case made up of judges all appointed by democratic governors ruled against maps that would have given their party a greater advantage. so, one of democrat has done? everybody is in limbo. no one knows where the districts are, the primaries are supposed to be next month. a federal judge postponed until the end of august. there s gonna be a special master to draw new maps. which is to say that new york democrats state senate democrats are not doing what reppublicans are doing. bumping hardball, they re not attempting to steamroll the courts and gather gerrymandering apps in place, or ignoring the court altogether. is that the right move? i don t know. honestly, these are not easy questions.
so, one of democrat has done? everybody is in limbo. no one knows where the districts are, the primaries are supposed to be next month. a federal judge postponed until the end of august. there s gonna be a special master to draw new mops. which is to say that new york democrats state senate democrats are not doing what our publicans are doing. bumping hardball, they re not attempting to steamroll the courts and gather gerrymandering apps in place, or ignoring the court altogether. is that the right move? i don t know. honestly, these are not easy questions. i mean, generally, yes, you should ve by the constitution. particularly when people tell you they vote for a prohibition on partisan gerrymandering. you should abide by states ruling. in both ian york, these were gerrymanders in direct violation of state law. but the net effect of republicans being lawless in ohio right now, at least, jamming their gerrymandered maps through over the objection