worst tweets like this one. if scotus accepts this formula for gerrymandering, then they are writing law, and that s not what nay are there to do. tom brady, you throw a hell of a spiral. oh, it s not that tom brady? i think it s a compelling argument. about one person, one vote. i think it s i think it needs to be corrected. back in a sec. now i have nicoderm cq. the nicoderm cq patch with unique extended release technology helps prevent your urge to smoke all day. it s the best thing that ever happened to me. every great why needs a great how. i hafor my belly painking overand constipation.ucts i ve had it up to here! it s been month after month of fiber. weeks taking probiotics! days and nights of laxatives, only to have my symptoms return.
democrats are at the table as decisions are being made and that we have a level playing field on which democrats can compete. it s also the first time that we have had an entity within the democratic party solely focused on redistricting. meaning, we re pulling together all of the different house and senate and legislative leaders of our party, but we, the national democratic redistricting committee, will be solely focused on our redistricting strategy a hundred% of the time from now through the redistricting process. and how is president obama involved in this? well, as your previous clip showed, he is very committed to rebuilding the party from the ground up and that includes the local races, the legislative races, it also includes making sure that redistricting happens in a fair way. we ve seen republicans rig the system with their gerrymandering, often illegal gerrymand
there going to be a wave or not? the ingredients for a wave are what? i think a wave is when you have candidates that voters know very little about. they re suddenly competitive or even winning. i mean, it is weird. there is a partisan tide. i don t see that there. i mean, to me, if republicans lose the senate majority, it ll be because they had 24 seats up to only 10 for democrats. seven seats up. it s exposure for republicans. short of winning the house, when would you say it was a wave? can you because of the gerrymand gerrymandering, is there a way you d say, yeah, it turned into a wave? if it got to the seven, it d be a wave. six if it was six first of all, in the house, i would say if it s in the high teens, sure,
savannah. it works on both sides. you re right, you re exactly right. i think the way the gerrymand gerrymandering is working right now is distorsion. it s not allowing expression look, eric what john roberts said, it would have been irrational if they started from scratch in 2006, it would be irrational for congress to distinguish between states in such a fundamental way with 40-year-old data. i think anything that deludes the federal influence of the government in the state s voting process is going to be frowned upon by this administration with their imperial policies and all of that, if this is going to facilitate these things like voter i.d. and anti-fraud measures which is something the administration isn t going to want that liberals aren t going to want, because they re going
savannah. it works on both sides. you re right, you re exactly right. i think the way the gerrymand gerrymandering is working right now is distorsion. it s not allowing expression look, eric what john roberts said, it would have been irrational if they started from scratch in 2006, it would be irrational for congress to distinguish between states in such a fundamental way with 40-year-old data. i think anything that deludes the federal influence of the government in the state s voting process is going to be frowned upon by this administration with their imperial policies and all of that, if this is going to facilitate these things like voter i.d. and anti-fraud measures which is something the administration isn t going to want that liberals aren t going to want, because they re going