that would not be the choice i would choose if you actually want to be president. a third party is not going to do it. plus, what would that third party stand for? would he do it for spite do you think, eric? i think he just said he wasn t going to do that. i think he said let s see what happens with the republican nomination. by the way, in your intro you kind of ad libbed around a little as well, geraldo, you forgot to mention public policy poll has him number one in north carolina. true. the economist has him, slash, mygov has him number one nationally ranked now. donald trump taps into the feeling of people who are sick of big government. people who want change, don t like the direction of the country. and they see him as someone who might be able to bring that change where some of the others that are running against him may not have that. will he flame out as everyone seems to think he s going to do? i don t know. the third party you think is a nonstarter? according to
bucks an hour and lunch. they are people who send money back to mexico raising their children. every time i hear one of these an dotes of a horrible act think of all the ones that walk their kids to school. geraldo, i totally agree with you but i think there s also a point about compassion, those community communities, those people would be better off if the local officials would work with the federal government to get the criminals out. that s the most important thing we should all be able to agree on. illegal path to citizenship following the laws and being here and afforded the great protections by the laws on the books in this country. why has the united states now become in the business of importing and allowing people to come back in importing criminals instead of exporting them? that s a great question. i have another question. where is the sanctuary for citizens who live in sanctuary cities? end it there. russian nesting dolls. it s smaller. coming up america is fac
legal and violate the fourth amendment. had i.c.e. sought the warrant the san francisco sheriff s department naturally and will always comply. unfortunately for the sheriff of san francisco i.c.e. has just released a statement moments ago saying that they strongly disagree with the facts and characterization of this case that that man has just told the people essentially saying you lied. federal government is saying that the sheriff is wrong. the mayor of san francisco has actually said that the sheriff is wrong. there s that. i also think we can all agree, whether you re in san francisco or the federal government that having somebody who is a convicted felon reimport into the united states who has a criminal record should not be here. i actually think the most compassionate thing you could do for an immigrant community is make sure the criminals are not allowed to be a part of it which would help make geraldo s point hu suggested the president made
people and a nation. when somebody talks about the war on terror you go oh, my god, you re attacking muslims. we re not. make a community safer, have more undocumented immigrants in it statistically. i m talking about the fact that you re accusing geraldo is being persuasive and wrong. washington post issen you vically wrong on this. here are the numbers. they represent the illegals. illegals represent 3% of the population right? 11 million, 319 approximately. 3.4 1/2%. 3.4% of the population commits 18% of the drug trafficking in america. not just of any subset. how do you know that? two more. 25% of the kidnapping 56% of all drug possession federal convictions. how do i know it? it s not washington post or right wing heritage blogs. here s where it comes from. united states sentencing commission. agency of the judicial branch of the united states government. those are the facts, geraldo. you can bring your washington
one thing that would help would be comprehensive immigration legislation that passed a city and was blocked by the house of representatives. that does not represent blaming them for a tragic death that obviously occurred. but it is blaming them for putting their own political interests and ambitions ahead of the public safety and national security of the united states. they do it frequently and it is appalling and offensive. last night making kelly question why the obama administration continues to cherry pick the tragedies it chooses to highlight. when asked repeatedly this week to speak to this case white house spokesman josh earnest declined to weigh in. other than to refer folks to the department of homeland security. a stark contrast to what we saw after michael brown was killed in ferguson missouri. his funeral saw three obama officials in attendance. his death drew comments from president obama personally. and the administration also sent in the doj and 40 fbi agen