be charges that stem from the same locus of events, obviously what happened on january 6th obviously has repercussions for what happened in georgia and the lead up to that. but they re obviously very different. and what will happen likely in the state level rico charges will be there will be more people identified, people who maybe outside of the millions that have already been identified in jackson it s indictment. this has a potential to open this wide up, introduced a whole new cast of characters from georgia that will also perhaps have some overlap what the federal case as well. again, as hugo said earlier, this is a very important case because it s at the state level. these are georgia laws that are being prosecuted here, not federal laws. and that means if he is actually convicted under these charges, these are charges that cannot be pardoned by the president, the only person who can grant clemency would be the governor of georgia himself. and obviously doing that would have seve
. there s been tremendous things done in terms of the laws and people being able to come in illegally and people who are profiting and have profited in major ways over the past years. it is great that numbers are down but also got a ways. that has a long way to go. i have to point out that you miss that these are most mostly peaceful protest that is a good one too much. next city employees have reportedly face mandatory training inspired by critical race theory and if they don t comply by march 6, they could b out of a job. crt maintains that america is and always has been structurall racist and classifies people based on supposed privilege. a source familiar with the racial equity trading tells fox news digital that when they tal about equity, they mean looking at people through a different lens, which goes against the
will be watching to see how thi all comes into play when the high court hears the case on that next week. trace: i have a little whiplash paid its overrated speck gone back to cupid think you, my friend. in the meantime, the commonsense department just wants to remind you to put some time side over the next few day so you can properly watch and all the apologies that will undoubtedly start pouring in from those who said that george s voting laws were racis and meant to suppress votes and subvert elections. at the very top of the list was president by new said the georgia laws for an attack on the right to vote at jim crow t .0. it turns out that biden s doj said the law was, quote, adopte with the racially motivated purpose. then there were the big purple companies and organizations lik delta, microsoft, coca-cola who
your thoughts on this. why not. they were taught that it is oka to violate our laws. they were taught that our socia norms mean absolutely nothing. when they cross the border illegally and there was no consequence for violating our laws, they were of course they re going to thin they can get away with anything that they can. they do not believe that our laws need anything and we taugh them that they are going to pus back against anything and everything about us taking everything that they want. that is what we taught them. the thing is on the flipside people forget that new york cit is a sanctuary city. they incentivize this. that asked for the smell of the got it, you heard near eric adams say we can t take anymore. exactly. here is the thing, new york cit and even mayor adams have a signal about how they re going to file a federal immigration
with the way the american judicial system operates. in other words, it is not unusual for a district attorney or a prosecuting authority to be generally uncomfortable with having to release progress of the case. that occurs all the time. but the judicial system time and time again has said, when matters are brought to the court system, we are going to be requiring them to be made public. because the fate of the public in the court system is much improved by operating in a public way. the judge said that his decision may turn on some of the highly unusual aspects of the georgia laws that define the scope of secrecy in georgia grand juries. i am trying to understand the basis for the request for nondisclosure. and i am approaching it from a