[cheers and applause] rachel: heading to a fox news alert, blackout pages of the affidavit used to search mar-a-lago have been released. will: some details we knew but also a whole lot more questions. kevin is live in washington with more. reporter: a lot of questions. let s be clear, last night we said with good reason that the affidavit would be heavily redacted and present uncorroborated allegations presented in such a way as to frame the argument the former president was up to something by having those documents at mar-a-lago and we got a look at the affidavit and there s not a ton of detail because as you said it is really read acted heavily. half the pages were read acted. a lot of sharpy. the fbi believed there might be evidence of obstruction, the criminal investigation began after the national archives sent a referral to the doj in february. president biden insists he is not sure if the former president had the right to declassify all the materials at his home.
trump people. we have trump s former personal attorney, rudy giuliani was rated by the fbi in the early morning, his devices seized. a year later they were returned to him and the new york times was told, not him, the new york times was told there would be no indictment on him and they spied on him for two years and it is extraordinary and other people, james o keefe also rated, no charges. victoria tens ling and georgia jennifer, attorneys, rated, no charges. it cost people enormous amounts of money coming enormous stress, damage to their reputations. why is the fbi doing this? is it to intimidate? is it to unethically survey a people to surveilled trump and continue spying, that has gone on since the beginning of his presidency?