someone set of 485-pound document. it turned out to be 485 pages most of them were just filler it was very easy and a quick read over dinner, in fact. doesn t say much of anything. it makes bizarre claims. it says that judge mike bernie was really an affair. it doesn t show anything about a supposedly unfair on the contrary, he ruled quite often against things that fani willis wanted to do. and asked to have fani willis and her whole office removed, because they were illegal or unfair. but that effort was already made by the fake electors and they were quickly turned away by the georgia courts. there is really nothing here. it is just air. it s obviously designed to delay, to confuse. you could see that it shows desperation except i can t believe that the lawyers expect anything other than a slap down. that undoubtedly instructed by their client to delay, delay. that is his go-to strategy. it did their best. and i feel sorry for them. there is no there. in faye act, the patience of
/PRNewswire/ Lex Machina and LexisNexis recently released additional state courts to its platform, and now provides Legal Analytics for 26 Georgia state.
i admit that there is an argument about what lying she may or may not have crossed. let s put it in context, this is a special process granary, it is not a regular grand jury. as you pointed out, simone, they do not indict. secondly, they operate under the rules and laws and ethics of the georgia courts and the georgia judge said you may talk about your experience on the grand jury, you just can t talk about the exact deliberations and the outcome. i think she skirted that line, but she stayed on the right side of that. she didn t say who got indicted, she talked about her experience like, oh, i love swearing in rudy giuliani, i got to shake his hand. i personally was only thinking about where his hand had been, but other than, that she talked about people s character, whether they were funny or not,
In 1982, one of our authors published an article discussing the distinction between the usufruct and estate for years in the February edition of the Georgia State Bar Journal.
anticipated. but very clear, right, that they believe this is out of bounds, that he should not be he certainly should not comply. given that they likely anticipated this, how long do you anticipate this legal battle is going to last? well, that s highly dependent upon the courts. i imagine the georgia courts will deal with this very quickly. the first place that graham has to go is to the georgia judge who issued the subpoena. but then he s after he loses in georgia, he s going to try and take it to the federal courts, and how long it takes there is anybody s guess. my best estimate, four to six months, would be a rough estimate of a reasonable time frame for resolving this, i think. that is not exactly on fast-forward, but in terms of courts, it is maybe not a snail s pace either. his attorney said, his attorney said that the subpoena would erode the constitutional balance of power and the ability of a member of congress to do their