thursday afternoon. getting a glimpse of the train of the george w. bush library, making this final trip with the president s body inside. we will have much more coverage as the train arrives in college station, and we will update you on the rest of the news today on fox news channel. ur money right into the harbor. i m gonna regret that. with liberty mutual new car replacement, we ll replace the full value of your car. liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. .to give you the protein you need with less of the sugar you don t. [grunting noise] i ll take that. 30 grams of protein and 1 gram of sugar. ensure max protein. in two great flavors.
afternoon where he will lie in repose at saint martin s episcopal church through day. on thursday morning at 10:00 p.m., there will be 10:00 a.m. there will be a funeral service by his family, friends, staff and officials who serve in his administration. service will be fun to texas a&m university in the afternoon to be interned at the george president president george w. bush library. to honor president bush over the coming days will be bipartisan. something has advisers say he d appreciate. we badly need to bring some civility back into our public discourse and into our politics. george bush had a congress that was totally controlled by democrats. the entire time of his presidency he had a democratic house and a democratic senate. and look what it got done. perhaps a message for the 100 xt and congress here as they
i m spartacus! i m spartacus! senator booker s release of emails was far from spartacus moment because he didn t break any rules. republicans on the judiciary committee had worked with george w. bush library to clear the emails was a lawyer for president bush that we were surprised to learn about senator booker s histrionics because we had our he told him, using them publicly. byron dowd tweeted i asked cory booker if his remarks were a stunt. he told me i was violating the constitution by being in his way. white house to be press secretary called booker s comments, quote, embarrassing and it turns out the emails were not damning at all, they showed brett kavanaugh was against racial profiling telling colleagues he favors, quote, effective security measures that are race neutral which prompted this, brett cavanagh did not
but senator booker s releasing of the evils was formed from a spartacus moment because he did not break any rules. republicans on the judiciary committee had already worked with the george w. bush library to clear the emails. a lawyer for president book said, quoting, we were surprised to learn about senator booker s histrionics this morning because we had already told him he could use the documents publicly. wall street journal reporter byron tower tweeted, quote, i asked cory booker if his remarks in committee or a stunned. he told me i was violating the constitution for being in his way. white house deputy press secretary raj shah called booker s comments embarrassing. it turns out the emails are not at all. they showed brett kavanaugh was against racial profiling, telling colleagues he favors, quote, effective security measures that are race neutral, which prompted this, quoting brett kavanaugh did not want to racially profile people after
nomination. in terms of the document requests they are getting and just the massive scope of documents that are responsive to those requests. brett kavanaugh, of course, worked in the george w. bush white house. they had e-mail in that white house. so there can be document requests for all of the e-mails concerning brett kavanaugh, and already the george w. bush library is telling cnn that there could be 1 million documents concerning brett kavanaugh. so david that are responsive to that request. so the white house has reason to be concerned, there potentially could be some red flags when they go back and review this entire record? to use the word that kavanaugh himself used in that minnesota law review article, if he has done something dastardly or even illegal that has turned up in these e-mails or records, maybe. short of that, if there is just something controversial or a legal opinion we re not already aware of, no, i don t think there is any trouble. i think republicans