An insiders history with neil mcneil and richard a. Baker. How did you get together with neil mcneil and do the book . The il mcneil is one of gigantic figures who not only do time magazines chief Congressional Correspondent for 30 years, came 1949. E hill in he retired in the mid 1980s, he went to work on what he hoped a quick onevolume history of the senate. Nd he spent 17 years trying to write that and finish it up. Needless to say he came by our the Historical Office on numerous occasions. E got a habit of going and having a lunch from time to time. We had wonderful conversations. He passed awayd, in 2008. And it was clear he was probably to finish it. And so he was you know, he okay, this issaid, it. He had the Oxford University agreed to publish the book. Sent it out the the viewers. Anonymous f the reviewers, got it, read it. His is going to be a 700page book. Didnt know when to start writing as happens with a lot of authors. And so my review said, this was a great book lurking
Chief congressional correspondent, came to the hill in 1949 when he retired in the mid 1980s we went to work on a quick one volume history in the senate. He spent 17 years trying to write that. Needless to stay he came by our office on numerous occasions. We ended up getting to the habit of going and having a lunch from time to time and so we had wonderful conversations. Near the end, he passed away in 2008 and it was clear he was probably not going to finish it. So he was basically say all right, this is it. Oxford University Press agreed to publish the book. Sent it out to the viewers. I got it and read it and said this is going to be a 700 page book. Didnt know when to stop writing. It happens a lot to dedicated authors. My review said this is a great book lurking in the 700 pages but somebody needs to carve it out. He died shortly there after and oxford came to me said how would you like to be the guy that carve it out. How much did you actually have to write yourself . About 20 of
Brand . I think our brand is a constitution, the rule of law, and our value system. Under that brand and under that value system, there is that notion of equal under the eyes of the law, and i know that brand and value system is the ada, trying to balance the rights of americans with diabetics. This is a treaty. A treaty is a law. The emotional and political arguments in favor of the treaty, no one can disagree with these arguments, but the question is, will the treaty have the legal effect thats being proctored by the proponents of the treaty . We dont hear citations to the articles of the treaty. We dont hear consideration of the reports, the concluding observations by the committees of the rights of persons with a diabetic. We dont hear the legal analysis appropriate for analyzing the legal impacts of the treaty. This weekend on cspan, more than 130 countries ratified the u. S. Inspired United Nations disability treaty that failed to gain senate approval. This week, they took up the
Our federal government tried to build a canal through the middle of Florida and repeatedly failed. And the damage they left behind set off a dispute that's still playing out.