Lot. The scare you part is that commissioner arce, youre absolutely right. They could set the not to exceed rate next week. They could move forward with a Shell Program and no other program, which as i said is only less than 4 of what we envision. So, but with that said, the reason that advocates have recently voted and said to the sfpuc and to lafco we would like them to proceed with these not to exceed rates is because they are now competitive with pg e. Especially if you compare it to a pg e green rate. And what ms. Malcolm proposed to us tonight are rates that will probably be even more competitive, even competitive with pg es brown power rate. The issue with the shell contract is that whether we like it or not, the local buildout that we all want is no longer tied to the small phase 1 part of the program. Its no longer tied to the shell contract. So, the reality is now that the shell contract is going to have competitive rates if the sfpuc sets competitive rates next week, now tha
Any unique things that we may need to do will have to be addressed sort of in that context of it being a state regulation. The task force has two meetings left and so, the last two meetings we will be setting forward some recommendations, and i will let you know what those are primarily we have been doing fact finding and getting some information, and the one thing that has happened which i thought to me which is sort of a key element of the direction to go in, that we can identify, and i hope with the recommendation, is because of this wage Task Force Working together, with the City Attorney, the district attorney, and private law firms, and there was one entity that olse had and there were some wage theft and the business closed was going to sell the property and the entities were about to leave town, the employees alerted olse and because of the Wage Theft Task force it really, the people have established a relationship so, the City Attorney and the district attorney, and the privat
Commissioner lee, why dont you ask your question . There is not so much a question, but a comment that i want to make. After the last meeting, i submitted my comments to them to give to mr. Shrine and i have a conversation with him about my comments because i had a little trouble of saying either we disagree or we agree. And it is sort of like black or white and it is really not that, it is more like this is what our department wants to do and what they want to do to move towards a certain goal. And so i left it up to him and i say, why dont you put my words into either i agree or disagree, because i cant do it myself. So from what i read here, it is consistent with what the department and what the bic wants to do but if we are hung up on whether we disagree or agree with the grand jury report, i would suggest that we not take it as black and white and just say yes, the content of this reply is consistent and lets vote on it that is what i am thinking. I have if we can revise it one mo
There is not a logo on the product. We have design team. While we are locked into a legal agreement with the landlord and i cant speak about the rent but its been grossly overstated. In terms of who signed the affidavit, i didnt feel comfortable signing the affidavit because i dont sign any of our leases and i thought that would be a problem if i submitted the affidavit. So phillip is the vp of real estate and construction. He was the one that submitted the affidavit and made sure that was clear. Thank you. Thank you. Mr. Sanchez, anything further . Thank you, Scott Sanchez on the planning department. With regards to trademarks, these are separate. Jack spade has one, kate spade has another. It is true they are all owned by kate spade, if you go 32 you the jack spade, kate spade is the owner. We are looking at the numbers who maintain the same merchandise and that is what we are looking at. In this case this is their 11th storement this code specifies 11 or more. Prop g reinforces. It
Or the media campaign. Yeah. Lets say that we are doing a mailer to say right to the board of supervisor and tell them not to cut them for the fire cuts keep them all open. Maybe the Firefighters Union will do Something Like that. And they would say, you know, supervisors you are actually spear heading a movement to help us in gaining the funding that we need. Please write or call the board right away. And that reporting would be captured whether or not the supervisors names were attached to it or not. And you know, it is kind of that would not be it is not associated with like a ballot measure or Something Like that, so there is actually no political reporting attached to this. I see. Does that answer your question . I think that it does. Basically, the same thing is endorsed. And i was thinking more fire house number 9 and they and there is a particular initiative or some ballot measure that is endorsed by these candidates already. And then you list that or those candidates who have