That he wouldnt break the rules of the senate in order to change them. This was not an ancient promise. July 14, on meet the press, said were not touching judges. This year, july 14, meet the press, were not touching judges. Then there are the double standards. When democrats were in the minority, they argued strenuously for the very thing they now say we will have to do without. Namely, the right to extend a debate on Lifetime Appointments to extended debate on Lifetime Appointments. In other words, they believe that one set of rules should apply to them, to them and another set to everybody else. He may have just as well have said if you like the rules of the senate, you can keep them. Huh . If you like the rules of the senate, you can keep them. Just the way so Many Democrats in the administration and congress now believe that obamacare is good enough for their constituents, but then when it comes to them, their political allies, their staff, well, of course, thats different. And le
Both houses. I would like to remind people of that. I forgot my second comment. My third comment will be my commentsow second now. I would like to thank god for the tea party. Without the tea party there are no laws. One last week. Tweet. Chris murphy suggest that the rules changes should apply to bills as well. Keeping in mind that just applies to executive and judicial nominees, not Supreme Court nominees. Peggy in washington is our last caller on the republican line. Ra, i would like to say that i think our country is in big trouble. Paulnk ted cruz and ron are the ones keeping things together. The africanamerican, black beple, in our country will crazy surprised when obama comes out with a turban on his head. I believe that this man is not black. You believe he is not black . I guess we will not find out. Thanks for your calls. Next i will tell you about tomorrow morning on washington journal. We start the day with a look at the 50th anniversary of the assassination of president jo
It, the senate would reach a point where we wouldnt be able to function. Well, i thought perhaps perhaps at that time i thought my words were a little apocalyptic. But as it turns out, they werent at all. And so this is a bright day for the United States senate and for our country to finally be able to move ahead on nominations so that any present not just this president , any president can put together his executive branch under our constitution. A president should have the people he or she wanted to form their executive branch. Every senator here gets to pick his or her own staff. We dont have to have the house vote on it or anybody else. Its true of every member of the house or senate. Its true of the judiciary, the third branch of government. They can hire their clerks, their staff without coming to us. And so now i think its appropriate that any president can now form their executive branch with only 51 votes needed in the United States senate, not a supermajority. So that is a hu
Ratification would solidify the strong u. S. Commitment to equal opportunity for disabled persons, protection for disabled americans abroad, wounded veterans. Greatear we missed a opportunity. Its my hope that we dont make the same mistake again. Mr. Secretary, this entire hearing strikes me as revisiting important fundamental issues that need to be asked and answered to reassure those of my constituents who have not heard yes yet. In your view, what is the response to critics who charge the sea rpd that would violate u. S. Sovereignty, and the Disabilities Committee would be empowered under this treaty to dictate how the iron states treat people with disabilities here at home. Sovereignty,ct to there is absolutely no ability whatsoever for any country or treatyity through this to gain any legal redress or to compel the u. S. To do anything. There is no oversight, there is a committee that works on issues. The most they can do is make a suggestion. There are 18 members elected on a glo
The president pro tempore are there other senators wishing to vote . If not, by the vote of 57yeas and 43 nays, the motion to invoke cloture on the nomination of Patricia Ann Millett is. Mr. Reid i that all votes for the Supreme Court is by majority vote. The president pro tempore under the rule the. Mr. Reid i appeal the rule. Mr. Mcconnell parliamentary inquiry. The presiding officer is it correct under the bipartisan provisions of s. Res. 15 adopted earlier this year that postcloture debate time on a District Court nomination is limited to two hours before an upordown vote is required under the rules . The president pro tempore pursuant to s. Res. 13 postcloture debate on District Court nominees is limited to two hours. Mr. Mcconnell is it correct under the bipartisan provisions of s. Res. 15 adopted earlier this very year that postcloture debate time on any executive branch nomination other than those at the cabinet level is or any limited to eight hours before an upordown vote is