watch the trial and will be mesmerized by it and we ll see that, like richard nixon, he is a crook. and they will change their vote. so, i think it is one of the only hopes we have. and i hope the case is not removed to federal court from georgia. because, we will at least have cameras in the georgia case. but i think it is possible that chief justice roberts and the judicial conference, or congress, could mandate having cameras in all of his trials. and i do think it is important to democracy is that we see it, and it increases our trust in the judicial institutions, in the justice department, in the special prosecutor. and so, it is very important. there are no good reasons against it. it does not lead to lawyers playing to the jury. it does not make the jurors afraid. because, like in the george floyd murder trial, when he was killed by derek chauvin, the
thought they all participated in these things because i think it s a just cause. well, now we find out the cause is not just and they are being held accountable for it. so, it really changed the calculus i think it will really play out in terms of what we might expect in terms of the trial when we hear talked about as well. speaking of those trials, jill, on thursday, you had trump s lawyers file a motion to delay the federal trial for election interference scheduled in january 2024. the date that they want okay, remember, january 2024 they want april 2026. a lot has been made about just how laughable that is. and i wonder, if you think that ask could actually backfire with the judge. i think it could. my new favorite word is risible. it is risible. if they asked for 2025, you have a legitimate negotiating position. but if you ask for that far out, well after the election, well after the events, it just does not make sense. and there is no legitimate basis. i mean all the
across the board, we have seen it, the militia based violence, which we will see director christopher wray talk about during his testimony to congress. it s definitely change. it s been muted quite a bit. and i think a lot of people thought they all participated in these things because i think it s a just cause. well, now we find out the cause is not just and they are being held accountable for it. so, it really changed the calculus i think it will really play out in terms of what we might expect in terms of the trial when we hear talked about as well. speaking of those trials, jill, on thursday, you had trump s lawyers file a motion to delay the federal trial for election interference scheduled in january 2024. the date that they want okay, remember, january 2024 they want april 2026. a lot has been made about just how laughable that is. and i wonder, if you think that ask could actually backfire with the judge.
trump to lead what they have found. and frankly, trump has all the money in the world, we keep hearing. so, he can go out and high road bunch of lawyers to read through all of this. there is a right to a speedy trial, both for them, but for the american people as well. jill wine-banks, jennifer rubin, think you both so much for getting us started. clint, you are staying with us. next, the threats are not stopping after a fourth criminal indictment, trump supporters, they are going after those who go against trump. and later, life-threatening and potentially catastrophic we are going to get to the latest as hurricane hilary gets closer to making landfall. all learning to save and spend their money with chase. the chef s cooking up firsts with her new debit card. hungry? -uhuh. the designer s eyeing sequins. uh no plaid. while mom is eyeing his spending. nice. and the engineer? she s taking control with her own account for college. three futures, all with chase. freedom for kids. c
i think it could. my new favorite word is risible. it is risible. if they asked for 2025, you have a legitimate negotiating position. but if you ask for that far out, well after the election, well after the events, it just does not make sense. and there is no legitimate basis. i mean all their arguments about, we have so much work to do it is true that they have to coordinate all of his trials because he committed, or is at least alleged he s entitled to the presumption of innocence but he is charged with crimes in multiple jurisdictions. and they are going to have to work out which trial can proceed. they can t all go at the same time. if he wants to campaign, he can absent himself. it is his right to be president. but it is also his right to waive that right. and so, if he wants to go out campaigning instead of being in court for his trials, fine. but he cannot ask for a trial in 2026. so, i think it will backfire, and that the judge will not