make that benefit available, the government has to find a way to pay for it and it can t force religious people to do it. that s the bottom line. it s been a monumental day. hannah smith, thank you for your time. there is so much more to this. because today s supreme court ruling revealed an interesting division of the court. it looked like it was pretty much along the gender lines. so what did the three female justices have to say about the issue of health care coverage for contraception? we re going to dig deeper on that after a quick break. some come here to build something stronger. others come to build something faster. something safer. something greener. something the whole world can share. people come to boeing to do many different things. but it s always about the very thing we do best.
americans want to see the federal minimum wage raised. 71%. yeah. a loft proposals the president has been talk thing about transcend party lines, gender lines. they affect the entire economy, not just women. it s not just about women s rights sort of in the hypothetical sense. it s about the family economy. i have talked to so many moms about the issues that concern them. i m a mom myself. the role of having great child care, great health care, workplace flexibility is enormously important to how a household functions. it s not just about whether or not it seems fair. it about making sure kids have a stable work environment. they aren t moving around a lot. they are able to go to school well fed. these are all related. that s why i think what the president has been doing in
who can t aill end the sew problem. the court will rule there are other solutions available and hobby lobby will win. bill: is that a distinction between the public and private company is that how the court decides? if michael is right, he will be here next week why the government shouldn t fund birth control. this is end of the day, bill, this is totally slippery slope. when corporations can espouse religious views they can do a lot of things. discriminate against women bill: okay. richard, thank you. michael, thanks to you. three months to wait for the ruling. thank you for coming in today. 20 minutes now before the hour. martha: you know, i mean it becomes, i think that question, i think that is what it boils down to whether private and public distinction in terms after non-profit corporation. people are saying it is coming down on gender lines or could be in the supreme court as well, although those gender lines also match up with political leanings generally on the court as we
i think i m alone a little more often. i think they should have done it along gender lines. it depends. just like one night every three weeks. you need more than one night, nicole. you need like three days. even if it shaves time off your life overall? the dog, the baby. so many people in my life. two words for you. empty nesting. so far away for me. i totally understand. i can. on a serious note. the san francisco chronicl chronicle . the prospect of two tech giants have the world buzzing. testla motors and apple s chief met last spring and could hint to a potential shift from
take care of children with down syndrome. alex wagner has basically built her career off parroting the democratic party line that republicans are at war with women. and even is an advocate for gender lines, we re supposed to talk about glass houses right now. i guess in her head she thought she was insulting the gop. but there is nothing funny about insulting the woman who happens to be an incredible, doting, loving mother. and just gave birth eight weeks ago. yeah, just because she is a woman. the tweet is completely inappropriate, but let s go to the facts. her state-of-the-union speech was completely no details that is a real criticism. yeah, no, that is legitimate criticism if you want to go after her position. but to attack her for simply being a woman in that setting and being a conservative, being a republican. and that is the bottom line. and she doesn t look like me. she looks like a lady who should