it s not even mid level staffers. it s low level staffers and robots and god knows who. the problem is it s just opaque. it s not that facebook is good or evil or doesn t have the right to do this as a private company. it s that it s opaque. if they want to be this hub of journalism and increasingly want outlets publishing directly on facebook and increasingly want to say they stand for and encourage real journalism why don t they tell you what the offending word is so you don t do it again or you make that decision not to be on facebook. and given how many people are getting their news this way, it s a little bit scary. i mean, there s a lot of unpleasant things that we see in the news that change the world around us and demand change. the most famous example was photos coming back from the vietnam war. if the media cannot get sensitive and borderline disturbing truths out to readers, it s not a great world. i don t think it should be up to facebook. before you go you just recentl
nutrition starts with nut. every other republican presidential candidate criticized the ruling of supreme you said the supreme court overreached. is that tolerance? it could be tolerance. we have a lot of problems. i prefer states making the decision and i let that be known but they made the decision and most of the candidates have said they may the decision, a couple are out there we will fight it. this and that. i would have preferred certainly if it were made by the states, the decision, maybe that is what would have happened. you never knew if it was 50/50 call. it is an issue that has been derby the supreme court and
frankly, i am about jobs. i am about making the country great. i would have liked to have seen the decision differently. you have another decision obamacare a disaster given to us by john roberts appointed by bush and who was push by jeb bush who pushed john roberts into that position when i look at the most militant on the gay rights decision, the most militant people are saying, this is nothing you can do. they are talking about constitutional amendments and they say that could never happen. you have to be realistic. what if this gets personal. i lived in new york in the early night when the tab lows went high wire over your marriage breakup and your relationship with marla. everyone knows me. i have had an amazing life, i built an amazing business, and actually they said i would never say what my business is worth the it is higher than what i
pbs news, we said you present both sides of an issue every single topic. two years ago when the doma decision came down it was difficult to find anyone who would span on the opposition of gay marriage on division because people had said to us, we understand we have lost this argument. we are not going to go out there and stand by it. that is a reason can the media coverage is bias because it is more difficult to present that side because people are not willing to stand up and say when you try to find statements there are a handful here and there and you can find protesters outside the court but it is difficult even for the leaders in congress are saying, well, i don t agree but they will not go out there. can you re-run the foot average of president obama telling rick warren he believes marriage is between a man and a woman. settled law and settled beliefs, do we have a white supremacist on every time we talk about a civil rights issue? no.
tomorrow. big, big supreme court case coming up. yeah. it will be exciting. one to watch. see, the problem is people are very passionate about their religion. so it feels like it s constantly religion under attack under assault in this country, right? like you re saying if you want to be a group that gains acceptance why do you have to constantly push the point, throw anytime face? what are you trying to achieve ultimately? why is this so necessary for them to strip other people of their religious beliefs? but like eric said it s a principle. in this instance they re on solid legal grounds. but there s a conservative argument they really have been taking to heart. which is that in the aftermath of the gay rights decision you want to make sure that people don t attack the church as an institution. right. that there s so much good in our society. thank you. so true. i couldn t agree more. but i haven t seen it. you say you re worried about iters kimberly. i haven t seen