this. the question is going to be was it tied to u.s.s. aid to ukraine? could they prove that so far there has been no evidence of that the president hats denied it was directly tied or that there was any quid pro quo and i think the big picture point is no matter what is found here, the democrats move forward on this impeachment inquiry before they had the transcript of the call. before they had the text messages that we re going to talk about back and for the between some of the diplomats. so adam schiff has a bit of a credibility problem in terms of them going forward with all of this before they had the facts. the president is going to have to make sure the facts are on his side though. he has been honest and transparent publicly about how he wants this investigated and by the way it s put a spotlight on jobe and hunter biden the way the democrats didn t want. brian: i m not sure all democrats are upset guy. ed: elizabeth warren might be happy. steve: at the same time, ed, it sound
ambassadors will be called to testify. we will see the inspector general for the intelligence community, michael attkisson back on the hill behind closed doors testifying today. guys, news outs of ukraine this morning. the prosecutor general is announcing he had a press conference in kiev that he will be reviewing all cases closed by his predecessor, including the one involving burisma where hyden biden sat on the board. ainsley: that means they re going to investigate? griff: it means they will review the closure, ainsley. that certainly would be along the lines of what the administration has asked for which is an investigation. brian: there is two things to it. number one, why was hunter biden on this board with no experience, with his dad in charge of the ukraine during the obama years. and number two burisma corrupt? i can t tell you about natural gas trade. there is the corruption of burisma and the role of hunter biden. i think the average american couldn t care less about burism