with the story of karen mcdougal, who had a contract with ami, which is the parent company for the national enquirer, their stories do have some commonalities. i mean statements that were allegedly made by mr. trump to both of them about them being special, about them being reminding him of his daughter, going to his bungalow at the beverly hills hotel. does it concern you that there are some commonalities in their stories? not at all because i m here to talk about a contract. i wasn t there. jeff wasn t there. michael wasn t there. you weren t there. she says it happens. he says it doesn t happen. i don t think anyone really cares one way or the other what happened 12 years ago. i don t think anyone cares. but i am here to talk about a contract, and i am here to talk about a fabricated lie detector test that you completely that no gal vonnic skin response. you know, i work with a polygraph expert for he s
been an expert for three decades. no gal vonnic skin response. no blood pressure. the questions were all wrong. do you know the person who administered this test? i have no idea. you don t any idea about the he paid $25,000. i looked at a picture. by the way, thank you for supplying that picture, that fabricated that s not the last picture. buckle up. where is it? buckle up. believe me you ll need a big one. oh, yeah. it s more of your illusions. let him respond. to quote the late hal heflin from the great state of alabama, he said when the faces are on your side, you argue the facts. when the law is on your side, you argue the law. when you have neither the law or the facts, you pound the table. that s what s going on right here. every time, we pound the table. boisterous. it s louder than you talk. let s talk the law. i m waiting for you to come into the case. when are you going to get off the sidelines?
to his face. i got to say this. no gal vonnic skin response. no arm band. by the way, the photos doctored. thug. why was the lie detector test, anderson, not part of the 60 minutes piece? because this thug doctored it. can i ask a question? just let me ask you a question about one of the broader points in this case, which is michael cohen s claim that he paid, out of his own money. right. out of his home equity line, the money in this case. have you ever heard of a lawyer paying a judgment or a settlement on behalf of a client out of his own money? no, but this is not a normal attorney client relationship. this is much more than an attorney-client relationship. first of all, there s nothing illegal about it. i never said there s anything illegal about it. if you understand the relationship here, you would understand that it would be completely reasonable for michael cohen to pay that out of his own pocket. donald trump is, according to