Earned. Notice its not much higher than 1955. Men worked in 1200 classes and women were concentrated under 500 classes. The conclusion of that report said mens jobs pay more with comparable education and experience. The context at the time there was a Supreme Court case and they ruled title seven covers wage discrimination whether or not the jobs are exactly the same or not, so it was considered a landmark decision. However, in the application of this court case since 1981 there has been a narrowing of the application. A lot of cases have used the bennett amendment to justify pay differentials based on gender, and actually in fact there have been few successful cases of comparable worth violations. The seiu City Committee on comparable worth was convened in 1981 as was referenced by supervisor avalos the board passed a resolution stating adopting a policy to erase pay inequities and based on race and sex and bringing the un classified positions towp charter and law. At the same time th
By minorities and women judged to be of equal in value and higher pay classes occupied strongly by non minority males so that was proposition h. In the same year the Mayors Task Force issued their report and seiu and the city came to an agreement how to implement pay equity. In 1994 to 99 there was a move to collective bargaining where discussion about pay equity moved into a negotiation between the union and the department of Human Resources Employee Relations unit. Meanwhile in 1998 San Francisco became the first municipality in the world to adopt a local ordinance perfecting the principles of the Un Convention and end all discrimination against women and in this ordinance there is a provision woman are able to get remiewnination and that in is the code. There was a review of the report on pay ecequity and said that 101 classes continued to receive pay equity leading to smaller gaps. The 12 year study said that study should be conducted since it was 12 years since the beginning of th
Comparable education and experience. The context at the time there was a Supreme Court case and they ruled title seven covers wage discrimination whether or not the jobs are exactly the same or not, so it was considered a landmark decision. However, in the application of this court case since 1981 there has been a narrowing of the application. A lot of cases have used the bennett amendment to justify pay differentials based on gender, and actually in fact there have been few successful cases of comparable worth violations. The seiu City Committee on comparable worth was convened in 1981 as was referenced by supervisor avalos the board passed a resolution stating adopting a policy to erase pay inequities and based on race and sex and bringing the un classified positions towp charter and law. At the same time the state passed a senate bill and its comparable statute but not clear whether it applies to charter city like San Francisco. Next slide. And then in 1984 mayor Dianne Feinstein is
Began in 1942 in terms of general order 16 issued by the labor board. Basically the federal government decided to adjust wages for women to equal men doing work of comparable work and quality. You can imagine when the men were at war the women were doing the work. The order remedied was a job assessment to determine the value of the work so thats really the origin of the discussion. In 1955 the u. S. Census bureau reported that women earned 64 of what men earned. In 1963 there was a federal equal pay act that was introduced that mandated equal pay with the following important exceptions. Under the bennett amendment allowed differentiation of payment based on one seniority, two, merit, three, productivity, or four, any other factor, so you can imagine employers went to look for justifications for pay inequities in terms of these things. 1964 title seven of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination of covered employers based on race, sex, National Origin and 15 or more employees for
Said mens jobs pay more with comparable education and experience. The context at the time there was a Supreme Court case and they ruled title seven covers wage discrimination whether or not the jobs are exactly the same or not, so it was considered a landmark decision. However, in the application of this court case since 1981 there has been a narrowing of the application. A lot of cases have used the bennett amendment to justify pay differentials based on gender, and actually in fact there have been few successful cases of comparable worth violations. The seiu City Committee on comparable worth was convened in 1981 as was referenced by supervisor avalos the board passed a resolution stating adopting a policy to erase pay inequities and based on race and sex and bringing the un classified positions towp charter and law. At the same time the state passed a senate bill and its comparable statute but not clear whether it applies to charter city like San Francisco. Next slide. And then in 1