Each odd year, guaranteeing that each president would have the opportunity to nominate two justices per four year term. Of course, this coming to a head very much in a big significant way because of the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the controversy over whether President Trump should appoint a new Supreme Court justice, as he is about to do. Joining me to talk about more on this, gabe roth, the executive director for, really appreciate it. Thank you for having me, dan. First of all, what is fix the court . Tell me about that. Sure, so were a national Nonpartisan Organization that advocates for greater openness and accountability in the u. S. Supreme court and across the federal judiciary. We want them to live stream arguments. We want them to be more transparent about their finances and conflicts of interest and serve a more reasonable length of tenure on the high court. Interesting. So your mission here is broader than just term limits for the Supreme Court justices. Exactly. A lot
The case then we will take a brief recess then hear the rest of the calendar. I will call the calendar as to the first case right now that i will call the calendar after the recess for the remaining cases per code donald j. Trump versus silas vance. Before i do that let me just read and you can stand there as a matter of housekeeping for all concerned, just to read into the record or the agreement that we understand is now in place. I am quoting from the joint letter to forbear enforcement of the subpoena between the oral argument in this matter october 23, 2019 and ten calendar days after the court issues its opinion on the following conditions. Number one and he certiorari in this matter will be filed in the Supreme Court within the forbearance. Any opposition will be filed within seven calendar days from the petition. Any reply will be filed within three calendar days from any opposition. Should any filing date specify fall on the weekend or the holiday federal rules of appellate pr
Already called them is already in ukraine when the call took place when the aid question was not even present. And that the ambassador understood there was a deepseated concern about russian and ukraine so we will see like they said. And to be concerned. [inaudible] mckinley was not involved in the situation. That fundamental fact has never changed and will never change there is no quid pro quo. Those individuals on the call have been very clear that there was no pressure or no quid pro quo they did not even know the aid was held up at the time of the call. The aid was released seven and a half weeks later. Those facts never have changed and it is interesting that the president of the United States first of all can have whoever he or she serves the interest of our country is ambassador but its also interesting even the president didnt want the ambassador there as well and that was clear from the call. Talking a lot about giuliani is it appropriate to go outside of channels to inform po
In the 2020 president ial campaign. Among the speakers were former officials,istration along with representatives from several Energy Advocacy organizations. From the Atlantic Council, this is one hour and 20 minutes. Good afternoon. My name is randy bell. Thank you for joining us today for this discussion assessing president ial candidates climate and energy policies. I dont think this could be any more timely given today is the first day President Trump can formally begin withdrawal from the paris agreement, and a year ago yesterday is the election. So we have a whole another year of this. Trumps animosity toward Climate Policy is part of the reason Climate Change has become a top priority for democratic candidate in the president ial race. It is also the result of increased media coverage, wildfires, a call to action on the Green New Deal, Global Climate strikes, and demands for candidates to formalize their climate and energy plants. The september climate town hall was unprecedente
Are joined by Bill Mccollum, former congressman from florida. Joining us this morning to talk about the impeachment effort in the house, and a former member who has an intimate knowledge of the clear whether the u. S. Supreme Court Whenever finder was due process required here what ever find there was due process, again, because the constitution gives us power, sending all of it to congress. ,n the other hand, it is silent and inherently in American History, due process has been accorded. I think that is what this process is right about right now. The president rightfully claiming that he is not being given the same kind of opportunities that were given to president clinton, or, in the rightsaying, this is not i wouldve had no opportunity to present and crossexamine. It is clear that there is discretion, and he might get it under the rule that was passed last week on the floor. It is not mandated or directed. Did president clinton testify . Caller there were people that of and he had a