isn t the truth, you just didn t really have a shared vision, for a future in iran? for example, many of the people around mr palavi would like to see the return of the monarchy. there are people in your group were more concerned with safeguarding kurdish rights, through a highly federalised future system, which is an anathema to many iranian nationalists, and when you put all these people together there isn t a coherent and unified position? but we were able to sign a charter which was reasonably good and balanced, where we declared our programme for democratising iran, a new system, new constitution, a new referendum for the people to decide the future of their own government, and also, minority, ethnic, religious rights. it sounded pretty
for example, many of the people around mr palavi would like to see frankly, would like to see the return of the monarchy. there are people in your group were more concerned with safeguarding kurdish rights, through a highly federalised future system, which is an anathema to many iranian nationalists, and when you put all these people together, there simply isn t a coherent, unified position. but we were able to sign a charter which was reasonably good and balanced, where we declared our programme for democratising iran, a new system, new constitution, a new referendum for the people to decide the future of their own government, and also, minority, ethnic, religious rights. it sounded pretty impressive on paper. it was progressive.
for example, many of the people around mr palavi would like to see the return of the monarchy. there are people in your group were more concerned with safeguarding kurdish rights, through a highly federalised future system, which is an anathema to many iranian nationalists, and when you put all these people together there isn t a coherent and unified position? people together, there isn t a coherent, unified position? but we were able to sign a charter which was reasonably good and balanced, where we declared our programme for democratising iran, a new system, new constitution, a new referendum for the people to decide the future of their own government, and also, minority, ethnic, religious rights. it sounded pretty impressive on paper. it was progressive. but my point is it didn t last