is that a good analogy? i think actually that s rather unfair to neville chamber ln sean. he got the central question of the 1930 s wrong but he was an honorable man who believed he was acting in the interests of his country and the british empire which he loved. when churchhill became prime minister he kept chamberlain on and had him chair the war cabinet in his absence. churchhill wept over chamberlain chamberlain s funeral casket and claimed he was an honorable man. i don t think you can say that about obama. what obama did is significantly worse than what neville chamberlain did. i don t think obama was negotiating on behalf of the united states. i think what happened at these talks is that he and the iranians were in a sense negotiating together to anoint iran as the regional power in
i think actually that s rather unfair to neville chamberlain, sean. he got the central question of the 1930 s wrong but he was an honorable man who believed he was acting in the interests of his country and the british empire which he loved. when churchill became prime minister he kept chamberlain on and had him chair the war cabinet in his absence. churchill wept over neville chamberlain s funeral casket and claimed he was an honorable man who just happened to be wrong. i don t think you can say that about obama. i think what obama did is significantly worse than what neville chamberlain did. i don t think obama was negotiating on behalf of the united states. i think what happened at these talks is that he and the iranians were in a sense negotiating together to anoint iran as the regional power in the middle east and to