Ordinance approving the special use district it enables this project to go forward. Its there for a second we continue to move forward and that concludes my report. Yes, just one question on the t e p funding its good news. The assumption is that a lot of this is going to be on the ballot in 2014. I take it when is the plan for t pe were anticipating january of 2014. Okay. And are there plans to seek funding in earlier or wait until the election and we do have fined in our capital plan to allow us to complete the design and the idea is to get the design work done such possible during 2014 so should this get on the ballot which those funds are ready we wont be waiting in the interim well get the funding we need. We also the 1 and 50 million level for the gop bopped as set based on counter seated Property Value because of the capital plan only issues imply debt as we retire old debt. I believe that the seated property in San Francisco increases what theyre currently anticipate there will
Otherwise. It will be on the ballot in 2013 and as well some general alternative support from the general budget. Thats whats Going Forward to the board and the mayor. I want to say aside from the paying off all of these are important investments but they dont fully fund the bike strategy or the pedestrian strategy but at any time a significant step forward its lee better than zero. Im very pleased. Well see how it fairs through the next step is that it gets reviewed and approved. I hope by the board of supervisors this month or next month and theres work to be done between now and 2014 to realize those revenues. And this framework it is april theres a lot of vetting to be done weigh also informed the Mayors Task Force this is the task force i mentioned in the state of the city address how to focus on taking care of the bike and the transit needs. That task force will be convening soon. The mayor will convene it soon with that goal of having remsdz to the mayor, the board the Planning
Property in San Francisco increases what theyre currently anticipate there will be nor room within that constraint to do more than the 150,000 bond. As we get to a point about a year from now we will be looking for the you opportunity to increase that amount. In the meantime, we continue to receive grant funding. There are other appropriations that were doing the consumer first grant and we have the 8th and the fourteen as well the two pilots the 76 and the transit only lanes on church street. Theres a lot of things moving forward. There will be the hijack church of money we will implement. Thank you, mr. Reiskin. I know that we need is an you tell date on the bicycle funding and how we were trying to implement the bicycle strategy. So this goes a ways to alledgedly that. You did say that there is a possibility that the finding could get beefedup a little bit is under in terms of bicycle and pedestrian funding or does this not address all of our needs . Do we have the possibility that
Was killed last night by a speeding drunk driver. I just want to reiterate the ongoing certain in since of urgency in improving our bicycle and pedestrian traffic. These arent more than just strategies those are ways to keep people save in addition to car traffic. I recognize this doesnt going to be sufficient to cover everything. I mean last time there really has to be a sense of urgency because i think theres a lot of issues for the board of supervisors and clearly weve got a great need thank you are there members of the public who wish to speak . I can wait. Good afternoon just two items under the directors report to follow up on items on items how many signups have there been up to date and theres reference to the federal fund given to the budget all the time that failed the federal sequesterer that was in place im wondering in terms of offering the fund but more in terms of offering capital fund can you direct your answers. More than a half of 12 thousand. I think i reported this
Only lanes on church street. Theres a lot of things moving forward. There will be the hijack church of money we will implement. Thank you, mr. Reiskin. I know that we need is an you tell date on the bicycle funding and how we were trying to implement the bicycle strategy. So this goes a ways to alledgedly that. You did say that there is a possibility that the finding could get beefedup a little bit is under in terms of bicycle and pedestrian funding or does this not address all of our needs . Do we have the possibility that theres more funding available for bicycle traffic i would say in the course of the plan the capital plan has some fairly optimistic general support that would go to those infrastructure needs, however, im much for confident as we present the bike and pedestrian strategies to the Mayors Task Force and people have an bd of how we really need those investments in order to achieve our investment goals to make traffic work as the population grows im more confident that t