authority from in the extreme and that s why he was taking his authority and saying collective bargaining is a human right. it is not. judge, you and i know it is not. it s not a civil right, it s not a constitutional right. you don t have the human rights you social with whatever you want, a labor union or whatever you want. you don t have a human right to demand that the government recognize some group and not you individually and that the federal government sanctioned that. collective bargaining is a form of agreement making sanctioned by legislation and executive action and on both counts can be withdrawn, fundamental right. here is why i think he said a fundamental basic right because generation haves grown up with liberal politicians using government money to win votes by luring the unions in and treating them as if they had this. and also we live in a generation, an era which everybody has rights.
extraordinary times we are in a serious crisis with the budget or deficit issue. have we gotten so acclimated this is not a fund tamement tal right that s true of any of the rights. listen. business has its power in these relationships labor and workers have their power that s just a balance of the system, judge. should the government even be in the business of selling us education? it is it it s a lousy job they collect tax dollars whether we send children to the schools they deliver a good product or not? that is the real core of the issue. where they should have collective bargaining or not trimming the branchs of the weed that s not going to be a problem one way or the another. the government has no business in education. we have been saying this for decades. have a free market in education and all of these problems
jake cop warren berger. there is a narg right for people to associate with whoever they want and certainly pli there s a right to join a union. no one could seriously argue there s a natural right to force the employer to negotiate with the union. that s a political right the government gives and the government can take away. that s the problem with all of the state relationships that you know what s going on in wisconsin judge is really a microcosm of what happens in greece and ireland you have out of control spending, out of control debt out of control commitments going on for decades and the chickens are finally coming home to roost. the protestors think the state is an independent fountain of wealth they don t realize it s the taxpayers that can t afford this any more can t bear the burden of the taxation. is it funds tametamentally fundamentally wrong for them to call in three-days in a row to
take children to political rallies where the governor is compared to hitler. the teachers lose pay the kids miss school isn t that fund amountnally wrong? i don t like any of those tactics. i hope you are not joining the villianized teacher s movement they have a right to unionize and collectively bargain and like any one don t want to give up the stuff they get at work. you wouldn t want to i wouldn t want to either. the right to bargain collectively with respect to stits comes from state bargaining. fdr couldn t get it through if they exempt the state. can t the same state that for dozens of years and generations have been heying we will talk to your unions are now going to say we are not going to talk to the unions. everybody has a right to talk, to discuss to negotiate. these are extraordinary times. people have a right to assemble and be advocated for. the problem here again these are
when are we going to start talking about responsibilities. very nicely put. on the side of and i would argue that people with rights are good and president would say health care is a right, it s not a right, it s a good. you can afford it, you purchase it. education, it sont sell as food, hats, shoes or food. why should it force us to buy from it with tax dollars the lousy schools? i will not argue on grounds of principle with you. a gentleman give me a slice of that. i will argue on the grounds of practicality. sure. this government runs our educational system and has ruined it. the on the grounds of practicality, i would say that the government has no rights, has no has no cause for it to be in the education business because it does such a terrible job. here is my argument, there s no choice and there s no competition. if we could go elsewhere, if i