i believe i have met all of my responsibilities, and the server will remain private. some democrats are publicly and privately wringing their hands about the familiar drama. an often contentious relationship with the press, forged in the 1992 campaign. this will test the character of the press, not only my character that has been tested. a familiar cast of characters. it is ludicrous and a silly story, a story driven by tabloid journalism. a lot of cookie stuff. the bare minimum, even to defenders and a penchant for secrecy. you just told us you didn t follow the rules because having two separate e-mail addresses would be way too big of a pain. you know what is a far bigger pain? trying to delete 30,000 e-mails. clinton remains the democrat with the most fund-raising potential, the best chance of holding obama s coalition together, and of being a barrier breaking candidate. and her allies argue the drama will sub side once shes had a
secrecy. you just told us you didn t follow the rules because having two separate e-mail addresses would be way too big of a pain. you know what is a far bigger pain? trying to delete 30,000 e-mails. clinton remains the democrat with the most fund-raising potential, the best chance of holding obama s coalition together, and of being a barrier breaking candidate. and her allies argue the drama will subside once she has a full fledged political operation. there is not a presidential campaign with 20 people in the office who can return all the calls and xerox all the statements. that s bumpy. and yet some democrats are openly wondering if a contested primary is actually a good thing for her. but not all agree with that, including 92 clinton rival governor jerry brown. certainly not. i can t think of anything i would rather have less where i would be rooting for president than to have a competitor in the primary. i m joined now by republican congressman trey gowdy of south car
bush to have the money. then you have the movement conservative group. and there s a whole lot of people from ted cruz onward the interesting thing about paul is he s trying to do interesting things to scramble the calculus entirely. going to try to reach out to younger voters maybe independents. also try to show the establishment not to be too frightened of him. he s not ted cruz. paul is the one i m really looking at. how about you? who do you think is leading on the republican side this time next year? clearly the field is broad and deep. it s exciting. jeb bush has a tremendous advantage going into this because he can raise money. he s definitely got the biggest fund raising potential out. i say nonsense. she was a very successful two-term governor in the fourth largest state. sounds like you re ready for
advocacy groups hoping to fire up donors in an off-year election, looking for a post-obama superstar, and in a state, texas, desperate to get a democratic party into relevancy. abortion rights advocates seized on davis as a symbol of movement of new statewide efforts in texas to restrict abortion. emily s list saying it s a story of grit and service. national democrats immediately saw davis fund-raising potential, inviting her to washington for fund-raisers, which were attended by nancy pelosi and dozens of u.s. senators. even davis bright pink wave rider sneakers became iconic for democrats. and the lightning rod for conservative critics and now it looks like too much too fast. in a cover story for the new york times magazine, robert draper paints the picture of a gubernatorial campaign full of growing pains and a new national star exhibiting first-time jitters. from the outset, davis let consultants drive her narrative.
states will get redder, the blue states will get bluer. in the national election, i don t disagree that a republican candidate has to understand them to be competitive, they have to calibrate their message. i think with a lot of fund-raising, they need to be careful on this issue. there s a huge fund-raising potential. today this press conference in senegal, the president made some news that it should be applied to all 50 states. it s my personal belief, but i m speaking as a president, as opposed as a lawyer, that if you ve been married in massachusetts, and you move someplace else, you re still married. and that under federal law, you