Contradictory message from each of them. But theyre hoping that they reach their targets. Listen to some examples. Four more years like the last four years would continue to have a president playing hide and seek trying to find a plan to get the economy going. To create jobs. This is a president whos whose approach to croating jobs is another stimulus. 000 the first one work out . You can choose a Foreign Policy thats reckless and wrong, or you can choose one that is steady and strong. You can choose to turn back the clock 50 years for immigrants and gays and women, or in this election, you can decide we will remain an inclusive, generous country. Now there is a pretty big map of battleground states right now. And you have eight of them. Eight battleground states that are really too close to call, soledad. But it not just states like ohio and nevada and iowa and so on. Theres also one very interesting state in the northeast that is never a battleground because its always democratic and
Pleased to see that. With respect to the puc ill give you my view the puc has taken the position if a bulb out is being built over water pipes its the mta responsibility to pay to move those water pipes so theyre not under the bulb out is a significant expense on the mta and frankly its not necessary to move the water pipes its for the future theoretical convenience of the puc if in 20 years they need to reach the pipe they dont want to dig underneath the sidewalk but underneath the streets that are a significant burden that the project sponsors from doing those bulb outs for a savings for the puc when frankly when youre doing a bulb out they can look at the pipes and see if its old and switch it out and did do it. Many cost shouldnt be passed on. I dont know if this is the future of a future hearing in terms of enforcement i know i held a hearing last year about double Parking Enforcement and excuseme. I should say the total lack of Parking Enforcement not only a sf pd issue they are
Pipes its for the future theoretical convenience of the puc if in 20 years they need to reach the pipe they dont want to dig underneath the sidewalk but underneath the streets that are a significant burden that the project sponsors from doing those bulb outs for a savings for the puc when frankly when youre doing a bulb out they can look at the pipes and see if its old and switch it out and did do it. Many cost shouldnt be passed on. I dont know if this is the future of a future hearing in terms of enforcement i know i held a hearing last year about double Parking Enforcement and excuseme. I should say the total lack of Parking Enforcement not only a sf pd issue they are the aggressive tools it is necessary sometimes a delivery truck has no way to pull over but we all see that everyday. The delivery trucks that clearly they have a place to pull over and dont both its laziness its easier to park in the middle of the street and cabs that pickup and drop off they can pull over but stop in
More and more tomb on 7 or 8 projects to give you an idea of what happens for instance, when another project becomes a provided and jump projects in the cue. We may have regular projects were working through and the mta directions the priorities and theres a group that needs to have that conversation and we may decide nor whatever reason a project needs to happen faster it will leap frog the projects in the cue. So theres a lot of complexity in the design there are several teams at dpw along with our traffic routine folks and the designers at a certain point they become a technical consultant thats a process like second and polk were doing thing for the fritter it can take longer than theres a lot of back and forth but ill note we want to take a deeper dive into the next meeting well talk about project examples what happened and when did it go to a real project and how long will it take the money to get here and when did we actually start work all of those pieces and the decisions that
Theyre not under the bulb out is a significant expense on the mta and frankly its not necessary to move the water pipes its for the future theoretical convenience of the puc if in 20 years they need to reach the pipe they dont want to dig underneath the sidewalk but underneath the streets that are a significant burden that the project sponsors from doing those bulb outs for a savings for the puc when frankly when youre doing a bulb out they can look at the pipes and see if its old and switch it out and did do it. Many cost shouldnt be passed on. I dont know if this is the future of a future hearing in terms of enforcement i know i held a hearing last year about double Parking Enforcement and excuseme. I should say the total lack of Parking Enforcement not only a sf pd issue they are the aggressive tools it is necessary sometimes a delivery truck has no way to pull over but we all see that everyday. The delivery trucks that clearly they have a place to pull over and dont both its lazine