in this particular case. versus seeing something from fulton da, fani willis, ou special counsel jack smith that is exactly what think. i think that it is a functio of the statute of limitations. this is, if you re jus comparing the types of crime that the former president is being investigated for or it s crimes that happened before, during, and after hi presidency i think that everyone woul agree that this is, not that this is not an important case, but this is the least importan of those that are unde investigation. and it is also one that need to be brought by a certain timeframe. as you point out. and i m confident that we ar going to see ongoing activit in the manhattan distric attorney s office in connectio with its financial investigation. which is something that the da has within his purview
establish that necessary intent. so that testimony from miss hutchison and others today could be used by the fulton da to establish the intent and several other crimes, including a possible there are reports that cassidy hutchinson is cooperating with the georgia investigation. so they will presumably, willis will have everything relevant to her investigation that cassidy hutchison has told to the congress. is there any formal way for district turning to kind of get some kind of cooperative help from the january 6th committee? well i think that what we are seeing is that as the january 6th information becomes public through this public hearing process, the da s investigators are able to make the necessary connections. it s quite possible that miss hutchison will be subpoenaed to appear in front of the grand jury once the folding da comes
crimes entitled 16, the regular criminal code, but there might be charges under the election code. obviously, by january 7th, the election was long over, but this notion that computers should not be breached or should not be used in a way that access personal information or copied without authority, those are basic principles that you see in many states, particularly georgia. so, it will become a question as to what evidence the fulton da can find as it relates to what has been reported publicly, and then she will make a decision as to whether she wants to wrap that into whatever case at the chi or the special grand jury will bring to the four with her report when they finished the investigation. we should also note that these kinds of breaches happen in other places around the country including in michigan for the firm cyber ninjas, which visited election building
different for graham because he s not a resident of georgia. fulton da, fani willis, had to deliver what s called a certificate of material to a judge in south carolina, a federal judge there. senator graham is in the process of fighting that, as we speak. we re expecting a hearing before a federal judge in charleston, in the days ahead. it s a little bit different for jody hice because he lives in georgia, and he s a georgian. so the court of jurisdiction here is fulton superior court. he argued in this filing that because he was a member of congress, and he was arguing kind of like doing his job as kind of a member, that a federal judge should hear a challenge, not a local one here in fulton county. yeah, this is the argument
ruling it out? absolutely. anything is possible. they subpoenaed a hand full of allies including his attorney rudy giuliani. so, there s a lot to talk about here, let s talk nuts and bolts here what happens if the fulton da does subpoena donald trump? you have a lot on your hands. i think it would move to quash the subpoena saying it is either political or not based in fact or something. two he is an expert at dragging out the subpoena. he has a phd in dragging out the legal process. if he is subpoenaed it would have gone to a court or a judge anyway. but you have a legal fight on your hands. it s not normal to subpoena a target of an investigation. you run a real risk of