violent ones, those, the claim is that they were left wing agitators, right? a majority of republicans say that the violent ones were left wing agitators according to the new polling data. 54% of this, this is a claim, this is obviously fugazi, false, not true. somehow they re holding these two things up, they re like paradoxes, yet republicans seem to believe both of them. either they re left wingers if they re violent or they were mostly peaceful yet republicans seem to be holding two opposite views, they manage to hold both of them. it s obviously crazy, chris. if you look at the with the next piece which is how they view trump s responsibility. right. none of this is donald trump s fault. how much blame does trump get? just 24% say a lot or some. 72% on average say little or none. so if there s any blame to go around, it doesn t lay at the feet of trump, it lays at the feet of the left wingers. that s what these republicans
if they weren t peaceful, the violent ones, those, the claim is that they were left wing agitators, right? a majority of republicans say that the violent ones were left wing agitators according to the new polling data. 54% of this, this is a claim, this is obviously fugazi, false, not true. somehow they re holding these two things up, they re like paradoxes, yet republicans seem to believe both of them. either they re left wingers if they re violent or they were mostly peaceful yet republicans seem to be holding two opposite views, they manage to hold both of them. it s obviously crazy, chris. if you look at the with the next piece which is how they view trump s responsibility. right. none of this is donald trump s fault. how much blame does trump get? just 24% say a lot or some. 72% on average say little or none. so if there s any blame to go around, it doesn t lay at the feet of trump, it lays at the feet of the left wingers.
the democrats wanted to control witnesses when they were controlling the house, but they had a ton more. you could count up to 24 if you put them all together, 23, 24. and the senate is now in control, and they don t want any. so the gop cries in the house were fugazi because they knew as soon as they had power, they d play the same game. the big question is what is fairness for you, for the rest of america and the left i ll argue that tonight. one of the upsides of my ethnicity. i have a special ownership of that word. it comes from bill. google it. i will. it is all but official. a new jersey democratic congressman will switch allegiances and become republican because he says he won t vote. the holidays are here and so is t-mobile s newest, most powerful signal. and we want to keep you connected with the new iphone 11.
look, here his credibility is especially so because he s the one keeping all these people from the process. all of that house gop bellyaching about the lack of firsthand witnesses was fugazi, and the reason i said it is because they knew their boss was the one pulling the strings. mitch mcconnell made it clear what the president wants, he gets. well, exactly how we go forward, i m going to coordinate with the president s lawyers, so there won t be any difference between us on how to do this. you raised the issue of what if you have witnesses. the president s counsel may or anyway not decide they want to have witnesses. he has a gift of saying things boldfaced that make it seem okay. you re letting the white house decide how it gets tried. think about that. what a gross violation of separation of powers. put it aside. now, the best that they can do here is listen to what the
and a sham. look, here his credibility is especially so because he s the one keeping all these people from the process. all that house gop belly aching about the lack of firsthand witnesses was fugazi. they knew their boss was the one pulling the strings. mitch mcconnell made it clear what the president wants, he gets. well, exactly how we go forward, i m going to coordinate with the president s lawyers, so there won t be any difference between us on how to do this. you raised the issue of what if you have witnesses. the president s counsel may or anyway not decide they want to have witnesses. he has a gift of saying things bold-faced that make it seem okay. you re letting the white house decide how it gets tried. think about that. what a gross violation of separation of powers. put it aside. now, the best that they can do here is listen to what the