i think we are continuing to seek solutions in washington, d.c. that should be sought in state capitols. but, alice, the states have had the opportunity to do this, and a vast majority haven t. and the u.s. severely lags behind other developed countries when it comes to paid-family leave. and and how is it not bipartisan? i think it s critical that states do take this by the horns, and really make progress on this because the more decisions like this we can have done at the state level where the money really makes a tremendous impact, that s where we need to go. and and and this is what happens is without decisions on the state level, it becomes a a federal problem, and they are quick to spend money. and we re at the situation where that is a key-sticking point in the spending plans that democrats are fryitrying to get through, and it needs to be handled more on the local level. you know, it s interesting that republicans complain about money being spent, when they spen
repetitive instances of this untoward behavior that put the company at risk? from the limited facts that we know, because we are not privy to the confidentiality of the agreements happening prior to the ouster of bill o reilly this week. it raises eyebrows. how is it that o reilly and fox was able to pay out $13 million to five women and then recently now pay him $25 million from his contract this past march. it makes you wonder how much did they know. there were specific exit clauses that said to bill o reilly, you have to get help and if you don t get your stuff together, you are on the way out. the way out is pretty pricey for them. $25 million from what we heard. ashley, the o reilly issue, they are fryitrying to turn the page. they have a new lineup coming
explosives. they are using drones. they are trying to build their own planes. they have been fryitrying to bua self-driving car. all the resources and the brain power that they have is being funneled into efforts to come up with the next most deadly tactic that they can get their hands on. wolfle? the airport security systems, there are various degrees, some are pretty good and some are great and some not so good and that s the problem. and, okay, you know the achilles heel in the system is what you need to worry about, the weak link in the chain. it does occur to me, wolf, if we re forcing all the devices into the baggage hold, many of them have the lithium ion batteries which is a huge fire risk and having them in the hold exposes the aircraft to another kind of ring. the other point that evan brought out that would be difficult to detonate is in the hold, pan am flight 103 is what i would offer you as counterpoint of that, december of 1988.
in this initiative. russia s foreign minister denied the accusations and in the same senate foreign relations committee hearing with secretary kerry republicans tried to place blame for the conflicten ukraine on the obama administration. on the issue of of ukraine my hero, teddy roosevelt used to say, talk softly but carry a big stick. what you are doing is talking strongly and carrying a very small stick. in fact, a twig. your friend teddy roosevelt all right said that the credit belongs to the people in the arena trying to get things done. and we are fryitrying to get something done. joining me now is a senior fellow at atlanta council in kiev last week. tell whults wus what was going e fight in the parliament? i know everything about the
saying this is unfair. you are fryitrying to shut us d. if they do. what they re arguing against is enforcement of the law as written. i think that s absolutely correct. the same way that this tape party targeting scandal was a phony scandal as revealed on the show. it was initiated. by a republican staffer in the cincinnati office. and there was never any obama administration involvement what so ever. i think you will hear this same dishonest characterization of the motivation to make this change. there are two things to keep in mind there. the first thing is all of the groups like the karl rove groups who are complaining that this is some effort to suppress their political activity. the 501 c 4 gives organizations like karl roves, the cloak of