there it s called a frye test. is the science acceptable like a fingerprint? i remember when i tried cases without dna, people. it wasn t that long ago. to hear someone screaming on a very brief 911 call, that s not enough for an expert, a vrt, voice recognition technology expert to say, yes, that s cuomo. oh, no, no, no. what do you think their big points will be? is i think their big points will be the state s going to argue that zimmerman was pursuing trayvon. we ve got the 911 call to show it. the 911 people are saying stop following the guy for pete s sake. you don t have a gun, do you? don t follow him. what the defense has is, hey, if someone were beating my head into the cement, i d shoot him too. so, true, that sounds like self-defense. zimmerman was afraid for his life, and he shot trayvon. but you ve got the problem that zimmerman was the original
never been introduced in a trial. you think this is a huge mistake. they follow a 1993 supreme court test, the frye test. if you re going to put scientific expert testimony in front of a jury it must be generally accepted within the scientific community. the expert said he s not sure which scientific committee he would commit into. nor get about the united states, no one in the world has ever used this test. it hasn t been pier reviewed. bill: how did they are attorney go after him on that, was he successful or not at poking holes at his credibility. i think he was a little ridiculous to go through the chicken and the beef. the expert said the rottin a roo