know, i was cleared at that level at times when i got briefed on it, i let the briefer take the information with him when he would brief me, i did not want to have it anywhere it would be exposed. you would go to a specific room to read it, and all of this cod gravely daging,nd i thinabout friend a right now, and wt they must be feeling knowing that the fmer president poteially put their security arisk, and this puts basically a target otheir head they could be executed if this information got into the wro hand evan, obviously the president often treats any sort of accusation against him with a loof public bravo, but privately,ou have some and what he s talking about.g thiis repting by somef my colleagues, gby orr and krten holmes, you kn, they re talking to some of their urces in the trump world, and, you kn, he s asking people
protect nato, to show the president that president putin will get a tougher western alliance as a result of his actions, not a weaker western alliance, and i think that events will show that the russian president has profoundly miscalculated. he believes he is doing this for his own political advantage. i believe the exact opposite will prove to be the exact opposite will prove to be the case, because of the resistance that will be mounted against what he is doing, notjust in ukraine but around the world. we will support those ukrainians, we will support them economically, diplomatically, politically and, yes, military as well, and i know in due time we will succeed. . . ., , succeed. can i welcome my honourable friend a s statement succeed. can i welcome my honourable friend a s statement this succeed. can i welcome my honourable friend a s statement this afternoon? i friend a s statement this afternoon? this house friend a s statement this afternoon? this house and this coun
your show and other experts, they are all sin you have an obligation to do that. so i think i have a friend a read a conversation taken down d transcribed a perfect conversation. sean: you know people president trump: he actually said this. did you know this was going to be a document analyzed? i said, no, but you have to understand, you assume are many people that it s either being taped or they have stenographers or tapes and i think they don t like to tape world leaders. i can understand that. so they have stenographers and people to take the transcribers, a perfect transcription of a perfect conversation. the other thing is, when i m talking to somebody world leaders, almost anybody, i assume that state departments come i think mom dominic mike pompeo, many, many people. do you think i will say
he wouldn t be sbrinterviewed b the fbi. that s not the response of someone who wants to plead his innocence. i believe both of these women because there are corroborating witnesses who have testimony that is relevant to these accusations. dr. blasey ford told her therapist five years ago, and her husband, she told a friend a year ago. she told a reporter before kavanaugh was named. she s already submitted to a lie detector test and she s asking the fbi to do the investigation. that, to me, is credible. those are the hallmarks of truth. and then you have all this other information that s been divulged by mark judge about his heavy drinking, about the books, about what judge kavanaugh wrote in his own yearbook. i would like questions to be asked about these very issues because these are relevant facts of the time that the fbi is not investigating. is it relevant that professor ford did not tell anybody contemporaneously or even for years afterward? well, anderson, if you know
part of the judicial system, as i ve said during my first my hearing, was process protects you. that s what judges believe. that s what our system is built on. the rule of law about fair process. since you were referenced, i wanted you to be able to respond. i ve heard from both sides, and i believe dr. blasey ford and i believe miss ramirez. both of their stories are credible. unlike his. where he wouldn t actually answer the question or say why he wouldn t be interviewed by the fbi. that s not the response of someone who wants to plead his innocence. i believe both of these women because there are corroborating witnesses who have testimony that is relevant to these accusations. dr. blasey ford told her therapist five years ago, and her husband, she told a friend a year ago. she told a reporter before kavanaugh was named. she s already submitted to a lie detector test and she s asking the fbi to do the investigation. that, to me, is credible. those are the hallmarks of truth. an