he is entitled to do that. there is nothing unlawful about that. really what you have is companies both networks and other companies you know bowing to public pressure and suppressing his freedom of speech. that s been highlighted in our univision fight. the freedom of speech is something about the government s relations with an individual. the first amendment is not about private corporations stopping me from speaking. you say freedom of speech aren t you confusing the two? not at all. that s what contracts are for. you are right, but what governs contracts, what governs rather the relationship between private parties, whether it be macy s and mr. trump or any other private parties are contracts and you know if a contract is breached then we re going to pursue our remedies and impress them as those companies would against us. are you sitting here wondering, wishing that he hadn t run for president? not at all. i truly believe in working with him day-to-day quite closely the