a balance of providing women free contraceptive coverage while providing non-religious employers with religious objections for contraceptive coverage. you expect this to go to the supreme court, right? we ll hear this discussed in terms of the hobby lobby case. i think the administration has a difficult case to make that this is not a violation of the freedom of religion restoration act. bill: there is a case in oklahoma that you think will be featured prominently. does that have a better chance? i think the implications of the case in oklahoma are much
means. i feel like that s maybe part of why there was an idea of a constitution and we would have government protections to make sure some of these, you know, thorny issues didn t have to get worked out at this level. they re using the freedom of religion restoration act. that was never intended if you go back, the intent of the law never for businesses but for people, for individuals who felt that their rights were being abridged by the government. it is a very interesting case. we re all going to be watching it very closely. it is quite alarming. thank you both. ahead, it s a fact, the pope is not a disciple of carl marx. no matter what rush limbaugh says. decisions, decisions. one all-american gal and the big choice to make in 2016. that s in your fyi.