law has been ddivisive. i respect the very real concerns americans have shared. i know a lot of coverage through this health care debate has focused on what it means politically. it should be clear by now i didn t do this because it was good politics. president obama today. here s mitt romney. i disagree with the supreme court s decision. i agree with the dissent. what the court did not do on its last day in session i will do on my first day if elected president of the united states. i will act to repeal obama care. governor romney called it bad law and bad policy. but keeping them honest it is also nearly identical to his own plan as governor of massachusetts. as for the mandate, well, keeping them honest, justice roberts today contradicted a key claim the president made. the president said that mandate was not a tax. for us to say that you ve got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase. what it s saying is we re not going to
i know the debate over this law has been divisive. i respect the very real concerns americans have shared. i know a lot of coverage through this health care debate has focused on what it means politically. well, it should be pretty clear by now that i didn t do this because it was good politics. i did it because i believed it was good for the country. president obama today. here s mitt romney. as you might imagine, i disagree with the supreme court s decision. and it agree with the dissent. what the court did not do on its last day in session, i will do on my first day if elected president of the united states. and that is, i will act to repeal obama care. governor romney called it bad law and bad policy. but keeping them honest, it is also nearly identical to his own plan as governor of massachusetts. as for the mandate, well, keeping them honest, justice roberts today contradicted a key claim the president made. the president said that mandate was not a tax. for u
religious liberty is written into the contusion. the framers understood the importance of protecting conscious. it s a key on the free speech protection in many ways. no matter what god you worship or if you worship no god at all, you are protected as equally american as i wrote in my opinion and religion if you have religious beliefs, religious people, religious speech, you have just as much right to be in the public square and to participate in the public programs as others do. you can t be denied just because of your religious status. the supreme court has articulated that principal in a variety of different ways and particular cases. you look at, for example [protesters in the background].