carley: love the sinner, hate the sin. spent two words are hard. david: we are in control today. julie: everybody was drinking spiked cocoa. david: guilty. but when you look at the judge, you have 187 judges that are aligned with the constitution across the federal justice system. you look at issues around the economy. evangelicals are not bound only to christianity. again, i worked for marla maddox. this was a prominent evangelical if there ever was one. and he would literally say, i have my free-market side of my network, am i evangelical side, and they can reconcile with each other. and that reflects many across this country. julie: we have to move on, amazon facing a wave of scrutiny to you this holiday season with claims to sacrifice safety in the name of faster delivery, next. without hope, struggles in the spider s web.
should this cost? s $2,000 within reason? juan: i m glad when anyone shows up. before you are a national best seller, juan. juan: you or i or greg or jesse, you know what, she is charging almost $3,000 in toronto and it sold out. you know what? the free-market side, apparently, what you get,d you get a front row seat, you get to meet her, take a picture with her. jesse: the free-market is benefiting. jesse: how many pantsuits does hillary need? kimberly: it s the new clinton foundation. greg: $2400, front row seats, a photo, a side book, that s what you get. it s a great deal when you consider the alternative. her being president. this is a bargain for everybody involved. juan: so all the trump
someone will put the hand on the wheel at the last minute and steer it out of the freight train because it is a policy issue, i think, contrary and most policy analysts who have been working on health care reform from the conservative free market side despise this for death spiral reasons because it keeps the framework of obamacare in place and degrades it in certain areas and then also a politics issue. you don t want to be on the wrong side of a 20% to 80% thing here. so, part of what we re talking about here is a 50/50 split right now and i think that will probably stay with us because it s interesting that no one else jumped forward to be the one to tell donald trump he doesn t get this bill passed. there is a very good persuasive case to be made from the mcconnell side which is if you don t do this right now chuck schumer will write the next one and also why are you so afraid of debate? i don t think anyone disagrees this is the last best chance. doug in the last ten seconds wha
you do? what do you say? no, i m not seeing any difference at all, whether the house bill passes or the senate bill passes. the same problem is still in effect. people cannot afford to access the healthcare system because the out of pocket costs are too high. until the legislative process or legislators really come to grips with having health insurance doesn t equal access to quality healthcare, we re not going to get a change in this. that s a problem. neil: on the private market side and the public, the government side with obamacare, what have you, you know better than others. the premiums have been increasing, the out of pocket payments have been increasing for all types. do you see anything on the horizon that could reverse that or is that just a supply and demand issue here? actually, in the free market side where there s doctors that are making direct contracts with their patients, we call direct primary care practice, there s a different approach. it s much cheaper. we re
a revolt from the right side? more from sort of the purist free market side of the party? you know steve, two weeks ago i thought that was the case. i wasn t sure how you square a circle, but there s been interesting developments. so the president as i know you ve reported has met with members of the house freedom caucus. republican study committee and hard lined groups and hard lined members. . and he s gotten them on board by ideas like block running medicaid or allowing there to be a work requirement. some of the thing things that doesn t contradict improving the structure of paul ryan s tax credits so do more to help lower income people, particularly lower income people who are near retirement and therefore going to pay a lot more on this bill than under current law. he was a health care policy adviser in 2012. now joining us from austin, texas, thanks for the time. appreciate it. hey, thanks steve.